History
  • No items yet
midpage
Francis v. People
2012 V.I. Supreme LEXIS 16
Supreme Court of The Virgin Is...
2012
Read the full case

Background

  • Francis was convicted of first-degree murder and sentenced to life without parole after a jury trial.
  • He appeals on four grounds: lack of independent intervening-cause instruction, insufficient causation evidence, prejudicial autopsy/photo evidence, and prosecutorial vouching in closing.
  • Key events: June 10, 2007 Spill incident over $2; June 15, 2007 confrontation in a store leading to gunfire; pursuit with a weapon; injuries to a coworker and death of Jeffers.
  • Medical testimony: People say gunshot wound to the neck caused death; defense argues the wound was survivable and death due to a later car accident.
  • Vehicle collision en route to hospital and ensuing medical care are examined as potential intervening events; experts disagree on causation, but the jury rejected the intervening-cause theory.
  • Court affirms Superior Court judgment, addressing each challenged issue and finding no reversible error.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Intervening cause instruction required? Francis Francis No prejudice; instruction not required.
Sufficiency of causation evidence? Francis Francis Sufficient evidence; jury could rely on multiple experts.
Admission of photograph was prejudicial? Francis Francis Not an abuse; photo probative of wound, not unduly prejudicial.
Prosecutor's closing vouching impropriety? Francis Francis Two improper instances, not enough to overturn; trial fair overall.

Key Cases Cited

  • People v. Lopez, 97 P.3d 277 (Colo. App. 2004) (intervening cause requires gross negligence or foreseeable result)
  • Auman v. People, 109 P.3d 647 (Colo. 2005) (causation elements in homicide; chain of causation)
  • Schaefer v. People, 703 N.W.2d 785 (Mich. 2005) (foreseeability; gross negligence can break chain of causation)
  • Mulley v. People, 51 V.I. 404 (V.I. 2009) (prosecutor vouching analysis; curative instructions)
  • Farrington v. People, 55 V.I. 644 (V.I. 2011) (criteria for evaluating prosecutorial vouching in closing)
  • United States v. Young, 470 U.S. 1 (U.S. Supreme Court 1985) (contextual review of prosecutorial misconduct; curative instructions)
  • United States v. Walker, 155 F.3d 180 (3d Cir. 1998) (prosecutor may argue reasonable inferences from evidence)
  • United States v. DiLoreto, 888 F.2d 996 (3d Cir. 1989) (impermissible vouching as conduct not allowed)
  • Middleton v. Roper, 498 F.3d 812 (8th Cir. 2007) (photographs; probative value in murder cases)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Francis v. People
Court Name: Supreme Court of The Virgin Islands
Date Published: Feb 28, 2012
Citation: 2012 V.I. Supreme LEXIS 16
Docket Number: S. Ct. Criminal No. 2008-0041