midpage
Projects
Sign in to see your projects.
2026-Ohio-829
Ohio Ct. App. 8th
2026
Read the full case

Background

  • Michael Francis underwent hip surgery at a Cleveland Clinic hospital, had elevated surgical risk factors including hemodialysis, then died after cardiac arrest in recovery while monitors were not properly connected. 1
  • Antoine Francis sued CCF, later refiled, asserting medical-negligence survivorship and wrongful-death claims and seeking compensatory and punitive damages. 2
  • CCF moved for partial summary judgment, arguing the survivorship claim was filed outside the one-year medical-claim limitations period. 3
  • Antoine argued a March 2021 notice email and CCF’s acknowledgment extended the deadline 180 days under R.C. 2305.113(B). 4
  • The trial court granted partial summary judgment, then granted CCF’s motion in limine barring a loss-of-chance theory because Dr. Grundy’s report did not expressly address it. 5
  • The jury found Antoine failed to prove CCF’s negligence directly and proximately caused Michael’s death, and the court entered judgment for CCF. 6

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Was the survivorship medical claim timely under R.C. 2305.113(B)? 7 Francis’s March 2021 email notice and CCF’s reply extended the limitations period 180 days. CCF said certified-mail notice was required and never given, so the claim was untimely. No; actual notice did not satisfy the statute, so summary judgment was proper. 8
Did the court wrongly bar loss-of-chance expert testimony? 9 Francis said Dr. Grundy’s report supported a loss-of-chance theory. CCF argued the report never opined Michael had less than an even chance of survival. No; the court properly excluded the theory because the report did not disclose it. 10

Key Cases Cited

  • Grafton v. Ohio Edison Co., 77 Ohio St.3d 102 (Ohio 1996) (summary judgment and de novo review standards 11)
  • Roberts v. Ohio Permanente Med. Group, 76 Ohio St.3d 483 (Ohio 1996) (medical-malpractice causation and loss-of-chance doctrine 12)
  • Blakemore v. Blakemore, 5 Ohio St.3d 217 (Ohio 1983) (abuse of discretion means unreasonable, arbitrary, or unconscionable action 13)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Francis v. Cleveland Clinic Found.
Court Name: Ohio Court of Appeals, 8th District
Date Published: Mar 12, 2026
Citations: 2026-Ohio-829; 115062
Docket Number: 115062
Court Abbreviation: Ohio Ct. App. 8th
Log In