Floyd v. Unknown Nurse Assistant
690 F. App'x 173
| 5th Cir. | 2017Background
- Floyd, a pretrial detainee in Brazoria County Jail, sued under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging deliberate indifference to serious medical needs by an unnamed deputy (and earlier claims against a nurse assistant).
- Relevant events: on Feb 23, 2014 the deputy allegedly assisted in removing a plastic splint from Floyd’s injured ankle and replacing it with an Ace bandage; Floyd saw an orthopedist two days later.
- Floyd also alleged he was placed in an isolation cell without a wheelchair for four days, causing delay/denial of a wheelchair.
- The district court granted summary judgment for the deputy; Floyd appealed the deputy claim but failed to timely appeal the nurse assistant dismissal, so those claims were dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
- Medical records showed no open ankle wound and radiologists had recommended removal of the splint before additional x‑rays; there was no definitive fracture diagnosis.
- The Fifth Circuit affirmed summary judgment as to the deputy: the record lacked evidence the deputy knew of and disregarded a substantial risk of serious harm, and Floyd failed to show the deputy’s personal involvement in denying a wheelchair.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether deputy was deliberately indifferent by removing splint and using an Ace bandage | Floyd: removing splint and replacing it with a bandage exposed him to substantial risk and constituted deliberate indifference | Deputy: acted consistent with medical guidance; no awareness of substantial risk or intent to cause harm; actions at most negligent | Court: No deliberate indifference; summary judgment affirmed |
| Whether deputy denied wheelchair or was personally involved in that decision | Floyd: lack of wheelchair for four days amounted to constitutional denial of care | Deputy: no evidence he made or was involved in wheelchair decision | Court: Floyd failed to show deputy’s personal involvement; claim dismissed |
| Whether Floyd preserved claim about being given Ibuprofen instead of morphine | Floyd: (asserted earlier) was given Ibuprofen rather than morphine | Defendant: disputed; district court dismissed | Court: Floyd abandoned this claim on appeal by not briefing it |
| Whether appellate court had jurisdiction over nurse assistant claims | Floyd: renews claims against nurse assistant on appeal | Defendant: appellee relied on timely-appeal rules | Court: Appeal of nurse assistant claims dismissed for lack of jurisdiction (untimely appeal) |
Key Cases Cited
- Farmer v. Brennan, 511 U.S. 825 (1994) (deliberate indifference requires subjective awareness of substantial risk)
- Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S. 205 (2007) (strict deadlines for filing notices of appeal govern jurisdiction)
- Gobert v. Caldwell, 463 F.3d 339 (5th Cir. 2006) (negligence or medical malpractice insufficient for Eighth/Fourteenth Amendment deliberate indifference)
- Carnaby v. City of Houston, 636 F.3d 183 (5th Cir. 2011) (conclusory allegations insufficient to defeat summary judgment)
- Memphis Community School Dist. v. Stachura, 477 U.S. 299 (1986) (lack of alleged or actual injury may defeat a constitutional claim)
