History
  • No items yet
midpage
446 F. App'x 236
11th Cir.
2011
Read the full case

Background

  • Perkeci is an Albanian citizen who entered the United States in 1999 without a valid visa and sought asylum, withholding of removal, and CAT relief in 2000.
  • She alleged the family faced a well-founded fear of persecution in Albania due to a blood feud targeting the family as a whole (a protected PSG).
  • An IJ in 2004 found Perkeci credible and granted asylum based on future persecution from the blood feud against her and her family.
  • The BIA reversed in 2009, holding the Perkeci family did not constitute a particular social group and remanded to consider voluntary departure and other relief.
  • On remand, Perkeci again sought asylum and other relief; the IJ denied, the BIA adopted, and the petition for review followed.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether the Perkeci family qualifies as a particular social group under the INA. Perkeci argues the family is a PSG due to immutability and social visibility in Albania. BIA/INA require a group sufficiently visible to society; evidence shows no broader social recognition of the Perkeci family. No; BIA's construction of PSG is reasonable.
Whether Perkeci has a well-founded fear of future persecution based on PSG. Perkeci asserts changed circumstances; women and girls are targeted in blood feuds. Record does not establish a well-founded fear of future persecution. Record does not compel reversal on well-founded fear.
Whether the BIA’s interpretation of the PSG concept is permissible under Chevron approaching INA. The BIA's interpretation is permissible.

Key Cases Cited

  • Castillo-Arias v. United States Attorney General, 446 F.3d 1190 (11th Cir. 2006) (affirmed BIA formulation of PSG; immutability and social visibility)
  • Matter of Acosta, 19 I. & N. Dec. 211 (BIA 1985) (PSG framework emphasizing immutability and social visibility)
  • I.N.S. v. Aguirre-Aguirre, 526 U.S. 415 (1999) (INA silent on issue; defer to agency construction)
  • Chevron, U.S.A., Inc. v. Natural Res. Def. Council, Inc., 467 U.S. 837 (1984) (agency construction permissible if reasonable)
  • Najjar v. Ashcroft, 257 F.3d 1262 (11th Cir. 2001) (scope of review: we review BIA findings de novo and factual findings for substantial evidence)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Floreshe Perkeci v. U.S. Attorney General
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Date Published: Nov 8, 2011
Citations: 446 F. App'x 236; 11-11381
Docket Number: 11-11381
Court Abbreviation: 11th Cir.
Log In
    Floreshe Perkeci v. U.S. Attorney General, 446 F. App'x 236