History
  • No items yet
midpage
Flannery v. Singer Asset Finance Co., LLC
94 A.3d 553
Conn.
2014
Read the full case

Background

  • In 1988, Flannery won $3 million in the Iowa lottery payable in installments; Singer Asset Finance sought to purchase those installments.
  • Singer formed a relationship with attorney Glenn MacGrady to provide allegedly independent tax advice to lottery winners, tainted by conflict of interest.
  • MacGrady advised Flannery to sell his payments; Flannery executed a June 1999 sale of eight remaining installments for $868,500.
  • MacGrady and Pepe & Hazard represented Flannery in the sale (March 1999 retainer) and then also represented Singer in related matters; the attorney-client relationship ended September 1999.
  • Flannery later discovered IRS tax issues in 2002; in 2005 he filed suit alleging aiding and abetting a fiduciary breach and CUTPA against Singer, claiming tolling under the continuing course of conduct doctrine.
  • Lower courts granted summary judgment, holding the statutes of limitations ran and were not tolled; Appellate Court affirmed; this court granted certification on tolling and applicability to CUTPA.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether the continuing course of conduct doctrine was properly invoked Flannery adequately invoked tolling despite not using exact phrase. Appellate court correct that pleading isolation failed under 10-57. Plaintiff adequately invoked; but tolling not available on undisputed facts.
Whether continuing course of conduct tolls CUTPA (and related claims) MacGrady’s ongoing fiduciary duties and 2002 referral tolled the limitations period. No continuing duty after 1999; tolling cannot extend to 2002; even if imputing to Singer, gaps preclude tolling. Undisputed facts preclude tolling; CUTPA tolling not allowed; affirmed Appellate Court.

Key Cases Cited

  • Beckenstein Enterprises-Prestige Park, LLC v. Keller, 115 Conn. App. 680 (Conn. App. 2009) (pleading tolling in avoidance not strictly required under 10-57 when no prejudice)
  • Bellemare v. Wachovia Mortgage Corp., 94 Conn. App. 593 (Conn. App. 2006) (nonjurisdictional defenses may be waived if no prejudice and notice given)
  • Watts v. Chittenden, 301 Conn. 575 (Conn. 2011) (continuing course of conduct in negligence requires breach and ongoing duty; gaps extinguish tolling)
  • Fichera v. Mine Hill Corp., 207 Conn. 204 (Conn. 1988) (limits tolling analyses for CUTPA and related claims)
  • Witt v. St. Vincent’s Medical Center, 252 Conn. 363 (Conn. 2000) (test for continuing course of conduct: initial wrong, continuing duty, and breach)
  • Romprey v. Safeco Ins. Co. of America, 310 Conn. 304 (Conn. 2013) (continuing course doctrine; tolling when record shows ongoing conduct)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Flannery v. Singer Asset Finance Co., LLC
Court Name: Supreme Court of Connecticut
Date Published: Jun 24, 2014
Citation: 94 A.3d 553
Docket Number: SC18821
Court Abbreviation: Conn.