History
  • No items yet
midpage
65 So. 3d 625
Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
2011
Read the full case

Background

  • Ms. Mock signed the North Florida Surgeons Financial Agreement agreeing to binding arbitration under Florida law for any negligence claim.
  • Ms. Mock filed a medical negligence action in circuit court; Surgeons moved to compel arbitration which the court granted.
  • A three-member arbitration panel ruled in favor of Surgeons against Mock.
  • Mock moved to vacate the award and seek a rehearing; the trial court vacated the award and ordered a second arbitration panel.
  • The trial court held the panel exceeded its powers by modifying the burden of proof, effectively restricting damages.
  • The court granted Surgeons’ request to confirm the award, but the appellate writ granted certiorari to quash the order and remand.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether the trial court can vacate an arbitration award under §682.13(1) Mock Surgeons Vacatur proper only under enumerated grounds; no grounds found here
Whether the arbitration panel exceeded its powers by applying a different burden of proof Mock Surgeons No vacatur; misapplication of law is not a basis to vacate absent exceeded powers
Whether a trial court can vacate an arbitration award and remand for rehearing under Florida law Mock Surgeons Chapter 682 allows vacatur and remand only under limited statutory grounds
Whether certiorari review is proper to challenge the order vacating an arbitration award Mock Surgeons Certiorari granted to quash the order; order vacating award deemed departure from law

Key Cases Cited

  • Charbonneau v. Morse Operations, Inc., 727 So.2d 1017 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999) (arbitrator within authority; not vacated for mere errors of law or fact)
  • Verzura Constr., Inc. v. Surfside Ocean, Inc., 708 So.2d 994 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998) (finality of award when within authority)
  • Commercial Interiors Corp. of Boca Raton v. Pinkerton & Laws, Inc., 19 So.3d 1062 (Fla. 5th DCA 2009) (trial court disagreement with arbitrator’s application of law not basis to vacate)
  • City of Tallahassee v. Big Bend Police Benevolent Ass’n, 710 So.2d 214 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998) (application of an incorrect standard not a basis to vacate under §682.13(1))
  • Schnurmacher Holding, Inc. v. Noriega, 542 So.2d 1327 (Fla. 1989) (review limited to statutory grounds; avoid merits review of arbitration)
  • Prudential-Bache Sec., Inc. v. Shuman, 483 So.2d 888 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986) (arbitration award not vacated for relief beyond court of law, absent grounds)
  • Computer Task Grp., Inc. v. Palm Beach Cnty., 782 So.2d 942 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001) (arbitrator’s damages award within contract authority; errors of law not necessarily vacating)
  • Schnurmacher Holding, Inc. v. Noriega, 542 So.2d 1327 (Fla. 1989) (caution against reviewing merits outside statutory grounds)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Felger v. Mock
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Jul 26, 2011
Citations: 65 So. 3d 625; 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 11572; 2011 WL 3055397; No. 1D10-3355
Docket Number: No. 1D10-3355
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
Log In
    Felger v. Mock, 65 So. 3d 625