History
  • No items yet
midpage
638 F.3d 519
7th Cir.
2011
Read the full case

Background

  • Four Illinois riverboat casinos sue five racetracks in a RICO action alleging pay-to-play corruption in enacting 2006 and 2008 Horse Racing Acts.
  • The Acts imposed a 3% surcharge, deposited into the Horse Racing Equity Trust Fund, to be paid to racetracks within 10 days of receipt.
  • Money in the Fund is not in the state treasury but held in private escrow and earmarked for purses and track improvements.
  • The district court issued a TRO requiring escrow of the surcharge funds; later found the Tax Injunction Act (TIA) barred equitable relief and dissolved the TRO.
  • The panel initially reinstated the TRO and reversed, but the en banc court reexamined the ruling on the TIA’s applicability.
  • The court ultimately affirmed the district court’s judgment and extended the TRO for 30 days to allow further petitioning.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Does the Tax Injunction Act bar federal equitable relief here? Casinos contend TIA does not bar relief since no state tax relief is sought. Racing defendants contend the surcharge functions as a tax and is barred from federal relief. TIA does not bar the equitable relief sought.
Is there a plain, speedy, and efficient state remedy that defeats federal jurisdiction? Illinois provides a state-court remedy to impose a constructive trust on tax proceeds. State remedies are inadequate or improper to defeat federal jurisdiction in this context. There exists a plain, speedy, and efficient state remedy; thus federal relief is constrained but not foreclosed.

Key Cases Cited

  • California v. Grace Brethren Church, 457 U.S. 393 (1982) (TIA bar applies to equitable relief against state tax collection)
  • Rosewell v. LaSalle Nat'l Bank, 450 U.S. 503 (1981) (importance of limiting federal interference with state tax collection)
  • Trailer Marine Transport Corp. v. Rivera Vazquez, 977 F.2d 1 (1st Cir. 1992) (classification of charges as taxes or fees for TIA purposes)
  • Sipe v. Amerada Hess Corp., 689 F.2d 396 (3d Cir. 1982) (TIA bars equitable relief against private employers' unemployment-tax deductions)
  • Hager v. City of West Peoria, 84 F.3d 865 (7th Cir. 1996) (fee/tax distinctions under TIA; regulatory vs revenue-raising)
  • Hill v. Kemp, 478 F.3d 1236 (10th Cir. 2007) (distinguishing taxes from fees for TIA purposes)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Empress Casino Joliet Corp. v. Blagojevich
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Date Published: Jul 8, 2011
Citations: 638 F.3d 519; 651 F.3d 722; 09-3975
Docket Number: 09-3975
Court Abbreviation: 7th Cir.
Log In
    Empress Casino Joliet Corp. v. Blagojevich, 638 F.3d 519