History
  • No items yet
midpage
Eastman Kodak Co. v. COLLINS INK CORP.
2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 127781
W.D.N.Y.
2011
Read the full case

Background

  • Kodak and Collins entered a three-year ink supply/ resell agreement dated December 15, 2008 with automatic renewal unless terminated with 180 days' notice.
  • Gambin (Collins) sent an October 10, 2011 letter purporting immediate termination of the agreement without following the contract’s termination provisions.
  • Kodak claimed immediate termination breached contract terms and sought a preliminary injunction to enforce performance and prevent termination.
  • Collins had stopped production for Kodak and bid for COD terms not in the contract, while Kodak remained current on payments under the agreement.
  • The court found Collins failed to comply with contract termination procedures and that Kodak could suffer irreparable harm without an injunction.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Did Collins terminate the contract properly? Kodak Collins Termination improper; requires notice and procedures
Does Kodak have a likelihood of success on the merits? Kodak Collins Kodak likely to prevail; Collins breached contract
Whether irreparable harm supports an injunction? Kodak Collins Irreparable harm shown due to ongoing supply disruption and goodwill loss
Whether a bond is required under Rule 65(c)? Kodak Collins Proceed without bond; no proof of harm to Collins

Key Cases Cited

  • Reuters Ltd. v. United Press Int'l, Inc., 903 F.2d 904 (2d Cir. 1990) (irreparable harm when delivering a unique product is terminated)
  • Rex Medical L.P. v. Angiotech Pharmaceuticals (US), Inc., 754 F. Supp. 2d 616 (S.D.N.Y. 2010) (irreparable harm and balance of harms in contract actions)
  • TVT Records v. Island Def Jam Music, 225 F. Supp. 2d 398 (S.D.N.Y. 2002) (injunctions preserving ongoing relationships and sale of a unique product)
  • Citigroup Global Mkts., Inc. v. VCG Special Opportunities Master Fund Ltd., 598 F.3d 30 (2d Cir. 2010) (standard for preliminary injunctions and likelihood of success)
  • Nokia Corp. v. InterDigital, Inc., 645 F.3d 553 (2d Cir. 2011) (bond considerations and remedies when injunction issued)
  • Red Earth LLC v. United States, 657 F.3d 138 (2d Cir. 2011) (irreparable harm and public interest in injunctive relief)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Eastman Kodak Co. v. COLLINS INK CORP.
Court Name: District Court, W.D. New York
Date Published: Nov 4, 2011
Citation: 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 127781
Docket Number: 11-CV-6513L
Court Abbreviation: W.D.N.Y.