History
  • No items yet
midpage
88 So. 3d 291
Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
2012
Read the full case

Background

  • Patricia Baker, a passenger on Royal Caribbean's MV Mariner of the Seas, purchased a ticket for a Cayman Islands mock pirate ship excursion operated by E & H Cruises, Ltd.
  • Baker was injured transferring to the mock pirate ship in the Cayman Islands.
  • Baker sued RCCL (and subsidiaries) and E & H under various theories.
  • E & H moved to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction and forum non conveniens; the trial court denied the motion.
  • The appellate court reverses the denial, holding there is no personal jurisdiction over E & H and remands for dismissal.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether general jurisdiction exists under 48.193(2). Baker argues E & H has continuous and systematic Florida contacts. E & H contends no continuous Florida contacts. No general jurisdiction; contacts are not continuous/systematic.
Whether specific jurisdiction exists under 48.193(l)(a) based on a Florida business relation. Tour Operator Agreement creates Florida business in RCCL/E & H joint venture or agency. No joint venture or agency; E & H remains independent contractor. No suitable joint venture/agency; no Florida business activity.
Whether 48.193(l)(d) supports jurisdiction via insurance contracting. Insurance contract relates to Florida-based risk. Risk never located in Florida at contracting; inapplicable. Inapplicable; no Florida location at contracting.
Whether the Tour Operator Agreement's indemnification clause or the forum selection clause creates jurisdiction. Indemnity/forum clause could bind third parties to Florida court. Plaintiff not party to the agreement; clauses cannot create jurisdiction. Not a basis for jurisdiction for a nonparty.

Key Cases Cited

  • Vos, B.V. v. Payen, 15 So.3d 734 (Fla.3d DCA 2009) (limits on general jurisdiction; Florida contacts must be continuous and systematic)
  • Gadea v. Star Cruises, Ltd., 949 So.2d 1143 (Fla.3d DCA 2007) (defines continuous and systematic contacts; no need for connection to claim)
  • Blumberg v. Steve Weiss & Co., 922 So.2d 361 (Fla.3d DCA 2006) (strict construction of long-arm statute in favor of nonresidents)
  • Haughey, 13 So.3d 1076 (Fla.3d DCA 2008) (insurance contracting proximity; forum non conveniens context)
  • Island Sea-Faris v. Haughey, 13 So.3d 1076 (Fla.3d DCA 2008) (Florida-based contact not established by ticket sales alone)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: E & H Cruises, Ltd. v. Baker
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Apr 18, 2012
Citations: 88 So. 3d 291; 2012 WL 1315882; 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 5922; No. 3D11-1260
Docket Number: No. 3D11-1260
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
Log In
    E & H Cruises, Ltd. v. Baker, 88 So. 3d 291