History
  • No items yet
midpage
Doyle Burton v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)
49A02-1702-CR-220
| Ind. Ct. App. | Nov 9, 2017
Read the full case

Background

  • On October 16, 2016, a maroon Toyota minivan rear-ended Mark Ford; the van fled but later was found parked in an apartment complex with heavy front-end damage.
  • Officers located the vehicle, recovered its registration from the glove box, and went to the apartment listed on the mail; Doyle Burton came out and admitted driving and drinking; Ford identified Burton as the driver.
  • Burton was charged with OWI (multiple counts) and driving without having received a license.
  • Burton moved to suppress evidence seized from his vehicle (warrantless search); the trial court denied the motion, concluding the search fell within the automobile exception.
  • Burton appealed, arguing the warrantless search was unlawful because the vehicle was not readily mobile and was parked at his residence; the Court of Appeals reviewed the denial under the Fourth Amendment.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether the warrantless search of the vehicle was lawful under the automobile exception State: officers had probable cause to believe the vehicle contained evidence of a hit-and-run and the registration, justifying a warrantless search Burton: vehicle was not readily mobile and was parked at his apartment, so automobile exception shouldn’t apply Court: automobile exception applies—probable cause existed and vehicle was readily mobile; parking in an apartment lot did not make it curtilage

Key Cases Cited

  • Renzulli v. State, 958 N.E.2d 1143 (Ind. 2011) (standard of review for suppression rulings)
  • Osborne v. State, 63 N.E.3d 329 (Ind. 2016) (State bears burden to show warrant exception)
  • Hobbs v. State, 933 N.E.2d 1281 (Ind. 2010) (automobile exception and diminished privacy in vehicles)
  • Meister v. State, 933 N.E.2d 875 (Ind. 2010) (probable cause that vehicle contains evidence permits warrantless search)
  • California v. Acevedo, 500 U.S. 565 (1991) (holding probable cause to search vehicle’s contents allows warrantless search)
  • Pennsylvania v. Labron, 518 U.S. 938 (1996) (if car is readily mobile and probable cause exists, police may search without more)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Doyle Burton v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)
Court Name: Indiana Court of Appeals
Date Published: Nov 9, 2017
Docket Number: 49A02-1702-CR-220
Court Abbreviation: Ind. Ct. App.