History
  • No items yet
midpage
DiMauro v. State
310 Ga. App. 526
Ga. Ct. App.
2011
Read the full case

Background

  • November 15, 2009, DiMauro was stopped on I-75 for speeding (96 mph) and an odor of alcohol was detected.
  • He performed roadside breath test and two field sobriety tests after acknowledging drinking; the first officer attempted the tests, then summoned a second officer for HGN testing.
  • DiMauro was not handcuffed and remained at the scene during a 20-minute wait for the second officer, during which he retrieved a jacket and walked around.
  • Second officer performed HGN with six impairment clues; DiMauro was arrested and advised of implied consent; breath test at jail yielded 0.105 on the Intoxilyzer 5000.
  • DiMauro moved to suppress the field sobriety results based on lack of Miranda warnings; he also sought a Uniform Act certificate to compel a Kentucky witness to testify about the Intoxilyzer source code.
  • Trial court denied suppression; it denied the Uniform Act certificate based on Davenport (later reversed). The Court of Appeals affirmed suppression ruling but remanded on the Uniform Act issue to apply the correct standard.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether field sobriety test results were properly suppressed DiMauro argues lack of Miranda warnings before tests violated rights. State contends custody threshold not met; warnings not required for field tests at a traffic stop. No error; suppression denial affirmed
Whether DiMauro was in custody for Miranda purposes during testing DiMauro was detained during the wait for the second officer and testing, implying custody. Detention was investigative and temporary; not custody, so Miranda not triggered. Not clearly erroneous; custody occurred after tests completed
Whether the Uniform Act certificate should have been issued to secure a Kentucky witness Witness is material to challenge source code; certificate warranted. Court applied Davenport standard incorrectly; no certificate warranted. Remand to apply correct material-witness standard; possible new trial

Key Cases Cited

  • Waters v. State, 306 Ga.App. 114 (2010) (Miranda custody rule for traffic stops; temporary detention not always custody)
  • Harper v. State, 243 Ga.App. 705 (2000) (detention at traffic stop not necessarily an arrest; custody depends on reasonable belief of temporary nature)
  • Davenport v. State, 303 Ga.App. 401 (2010) (Uniform Act standard; witness testifying from out of state)
  • Davenport v. State, 289 Ga. 399 (2011) (Supreme Court reversed; defined 'material' witness under Uniform Act)
  • Yeary v. State, 302 Ga.App. 535 (2010) (Supreme Court reversed related ruling on Yeary)
  • Yeary v. State, 289 Ga. 394 (2011) (Supreme Court decision related to Yeary reversal)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: DiMauro v. State
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Date Published: Jul 6, 2011
Citation: 310 Ga. App. 526
Docket Number: A11A0189
Court Abbreviation: Ga. Ct. App.