History
  • No items yet
midpage
Dept. of Human Services v. D. L.
303 Or. App. 286
| Or. Ct. App. | 2020
Read the full case

Background

  • Juvenile court assumed dependency jurisdiction under ORS 419B.100(1)(c) over 13‑year‑old A after an incident ~3.5 months before the hearing in which mother kicked A and threw a heavy wooden stool that struck A’s face and caused a black eye; DHS removed A.
  • A testified about the assault and its effects (nightmares); the juvenile court expressly credited A’s testimony over mother’s conflicting account.
  • Mother minimized the incident at the hearing (describing a "tap" and a thrown "wooden block") and had instructed A to lie to the school nurse about the injury.
  • The juvenile court found mother has anger and impulse‑control problems, ordered a psychological evaluation, and found that DHS made reasonable efforts to reunify.
  • Mother appealed, challenging (1) sufficiency of evidence for dependency jurisdiction, (2) the juvenile court’s finding that DHS made reasonable reunification efforts, and (3) the order for a psychological evaluation (arguing plain error).

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Sufficiency of evidence for dependency jurisdiction under ORS 419B.100(1)(c) DHS: Assault + mother’s minimization support finding of current risk of serious injury Mother: Incident was isolated; record does not show a continuing/current risk or present anger/impulse problems Affirmed: Evidence (assault + mother’s untruths/minimization) permissibly supports a finding of current risk and jurisdiction
Whether DHS made "reasonable efforts" to reunify under ORS 419B.340 DHS: Case complications (child unwilling; potential criminal charges) limited practicable efforts Mother: DHS did very little and did not give her a reasonable opportunity to make needed adjustments Reversed: Record does not support the juvenile court’s conclusion that DHS made reasonable efforts; remanded to correct that determination
Whether ordering mother to undergo a psychological evaluation was plain error DHS: Evaluation order permissible Mother: Did not preserve objection; contends plain error Affirmed: No plain error—prior controlling authority (L. J. W.) forecloses mother's claim

Key Cases Cited

  • Dept. of Human Services v. L. J. W., 302 Or App 126 (2020) (addressing plain‑error review of a similar challenge to a psychological‑evaluation order)
  • Dept. of Human Services v. C. D. B., 299 Or App 513 (2019) (explaining the "current threat of serious loss or injury" standard under ORS 419B.100(1)(c))
  • Dept. of Human Services v. N. P., 257 Or App 633 (2013) (describing sufficiency review for juvenile‑court dispositions)
  • Dept. of Human Services v. J. F. D., 255 Or App 742 (2013) (discussing reasonable‑efforts requirement under ORS 419B.340)
  • State ex rel Juv. Dept. v. Williams, 204 Or App 496 (2006) (defining "reasonable efforts" as assistance enabling parents to become minimally adequate)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Dept. of Human Services v. D. L.
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Oregon
Date Published: Apr 1, 2020
Citation: 303 Or. App. 286
Docket Number: A172301
Court Abbreviation: Or. Ct. App.