Degraw Construction Group, Inc. v. McGowan Builders, Inc.
152 A.D.3d 567
| N.Y. App. Div. | 2017Background
- Degraw Construction Group (plaintiff) sued McGowan Builders and several individual defendants to foreclose a mechanic's lien and asserted tort claims (conversion, unfair competition, tortious interference) against the individual defendants.
- Plaintiff alleged it contracted with McGowan Builders to perform work and was not fully paid.
- The subcontract between plaintiff and McGowan Builders contained a broad arbitration clause covering "all claims, disputes and other matters arising out of or relating to" the agreement.
- The individual defendants (officers/employees of McGowan Builders) were not signatories to the subcontract.
- McGowan Builders and the individual defendants moved to compel arbitration of the tort claims against the individuals; the trial court denied arbitration as to the individual defendants because they were nonsignatories.
- The Appellate Division reversed, finding the individual defendants could enforce the arbitration clause because the alleged misconduct arose from their roles as corporate agents.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Can nonsignatory individual officers/employees compel arbitration of tort claims arising from conduct connected to a contract with an arbitration clause? | Plaintiff argued the individuals are nonsignatories and therefore cannot enforce the arbitration clause. | Defendants argued the arbitration clause is broad and the tort claims arise from their roles as corporate agents, so they can enforce it. | The court held nonsignatory corporate officers/employees may enforce the arbitration clause where claims stem from actions taken on behalf of the corporation and relate to the contract. |
Key Cases Cited
- Matter of Belzberg v. Verus Invs. Holdings Inc., 21 N.Y.3d 626 (Court of Appeals) (arbitration is contractual; parties must agree to arbitrate)
- Hirschfeld Prods. v. Mirvish, 88 N.Y.2d 1054 (Court of Appeals) (corporate officers/employees may enforce corporate arbitration agreements to prevent circumvention and effectuate signatories' intent)
- Matter of Groval Knitted Fabrics, 31 N.Y.2d 796 (Court of Appeals) (recognizing enforcement of arbitration rights by corporate agents in similar circumstances)
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. Kaplan, 514 U.S. 938 (U.S. Supreme Court) (apply ordinary state-law contract principles to determine arbitrability)
- Oxbow Calcining U.S.A., Inc. v. American Indus. Partners, 96 A.D.3d 646 (App. Div.) (general rule that only parties to an arbitration agreement are bound, but exceptions exist)
- Highland HC, LLC v. Scott, 113 A.D.3d 590 (App. Div.) (upholding nonsignatory enforcement where claims arise from corporate role)
