Davis v. Baltimore Hebrew Congregation
2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 169471
D. Maryland2013Background
- Davis, African-American, employed by Baltimore Hebrew Congregation (BHC) since 1998 as Associate Facilities Manager, later Facilities Manager.
- Davis’s duties included maintenance, repairs, custodial work, and supervising staff; he reported to BHC’s Executive Director.
- In Oct 2008, Davis lost scheduling and purchasing authority, though he remained responsible for ensuring adequate maintenance staffing and coverage.
- In 2009, Davis faced performance issues including communication failures, disrespectful conduct, and failure to complete tasks; he was ultimately terminated on Oct 5, 2009 with multiple stated reasons.
- Davis alleges race discrimination, claiming a plantation-like environment and a racial slur incident by a non-employee; most time-barred under Morgan for Title VII, with §1981 analysis limited to timely acts.
- Davis also asserted disability discrimination and retaliation under the ADA and state wage claims; the court held in each instance that Davis failed to establish prima facie or pretext, and at-will status and handbook language undermined contract and wrongful discharge theories.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| ministerial exception applicability | Davis’s role involved religious aspects; ministerial exception should bar claims. | Davis was not a minister; primary duties were secular. | Ministerial exception does not apply; claims proceed to merits. |
| race discrimination under §1981/Title VII | Davis claims discriminatory termination and hostile environment. | No timely prima facie case; legitimate non-discriminatory reasons shown. | No triable issue; under McDonnell Douglas, no pretext proven; summary judgment for BHC. |
| §1983 and §1982 claims; property and state action | Fourth Amendment/ equal protection concerns preserved. | BHC not a state actor; §1983 claim fails; §1982 requires a protected property interest which Davis lacked. | Counts II and III are resolved in Defendant’s favor. |
| ADA and failure to accommodate | Davis sought reasonable accommodations for back injury; qualified disability status disputed. | Accommodation requested would require additional staff; Davis could work light duty and assign tasks. | No prima facie ADA claim; summary judgment for BHC. |
| breach of contract and wrongful discharge | Handbook created contractual rights; wrongful discharge claim applicable. | Handbook states at-will employment and disclaims contractual intent. | No contract or wrongful discharge claim; summary judgment for BHC. |
Key Cases Cited
- Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church v. EEOC, 565 U.S. 171 (2012) (ministerial exception applies to religious employment relations)
- Rayburn v. Gen. Conf. of Seventh-Day Adventists, 772 F.2d 1164 (4th Cir. 1985) (fact-specific 'primary duties' test for ministerial exception)
- EEOC v. Roman Catholic Diocese of Raleigh, N.C., 213 F.3d 795 (4th Cir. 2000) (ministerial-employee analysis in religious institutions)
- Shaliehsabou v. Hebrew Home of Greater Washington, Inc., 363 F.3d 299 (4th Cir. 2004) (extensive training/role recognized as ministerial for some staff)
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green, 411 U.S. 792 (1973) (framework for proving and addressing discrimination claims)
- St. Mary’s Honor Ctr. v. Hicks, 509 U.S. 502 (1993) (pretext evidence standard after prim a facie case)
- Morgan v. National Railroad Passenger Corp., 536 U.S. 101 (2002) (timing of discriminatory acts; timely acts required for liability)
