History
  • No items yet
midpage
488 F. App'x 107
6th Cir.
2012
Read the full case

Background

  • Rocky Cutlip, Jr. died by suicide during a two-hour police standoff with Toledo officers in May 2007.
  • Cutlip, Sr. sued the City of Toledo under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging inadequate training and supervision of police handling mentally ill/barricaded suspects.
  • District court granted summary judgment, finding no underlying constitutional violation and no deliberate indifference by officers.
  • CIT-style negotiation occurred; officers considered a forced entry with a flash-bang device and beanbag rounds to disarm Rocky.
  • Rocky either involuntarily pulled the trigger after the flash-bang or intentionally committed suicide; factual dispute acknowledged for purposes of the state-created-danger discussion.
  • Court affirmed summary judgment, holding no constitutional violation and no municipal liability under § 1983.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Does custody exception apply to this suicide case? Rocky was seized and restrained, creating custody. Rocky was not incarcerated or helpless; not in custody. Custody exception does not apply; no constitutional duty created.
Can the state-created-danger doctrine support liability where suicide occurs? Police actions created/increased risk of Rocky’s suicide. Doctrine not applicable to suicide; dangerous popular cases require prior creation of danger by state. State-created-danger doctrine does not apply to Rocky’s suicide in this context.
Was there an underlying constitutional violation sufficient for § 1983 municipal liability? City’s training/supervision deficient, causing rights violations. No underlying violation; policies were not shown to cause harm with deliberate indifference. No underlying constitutional violation; district court’s summary judgment affirmed.

Key Cases Cited

  • DeShaney v. Winnebago County Dep’t of Soc. Servs., 489 U.S. 189 (1989) (Due Process limits on state duty to protect; exceptions apply only in narrow circumstances)
  • Ewolski v. City of Brunswick, 287 F.3d 492 (6th Cir.2002) (Custody-like and state-created-danger analyses in barricade cases)
  • Estate of Smithers v. City of Flint, 602 F.3d 758 (6th Cir.2010) (State-created-danger framework in the Sixth Circuit)
  • Monell v. Dep’t of Soc. Servs., 436 U.S. 658 (1978) (Municipal liability requires a policy or custom causing the violation)
  • McQueen v. Beecher Cmty. Sch., 433 F.3d 460 (6th Cir.2006) (Liability standards for supervisor/municipal training failures)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Cutlip Ex Rel. Cutlip v. City of Toledo
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Date Published: Jul 5, 2012
Citations: 488 F. App'x 107; 10-4350
Docket Number: 10-4350
Court Abbreviation: 6th Cir.
Log In
    Cutlip Ex Rel. Cutlip v. City of Toledo, 488 F. App'x 107