History
  • No items yet
midpage
Cullingford v. City Of Houston
4:11-cv-00523
S.D. Tex.
Mar 20, 2012
Read the full case

Background

  • Cullingford alleges police misconduct by Houston officers, including Morales, starting with an August 5, 2009 incident at her home.
  • She was arrested, her home and purse were searched without permission, and she was jailed for about 15 hours.
  • She contends jailers used force, threatened Tasering, and caused pain and injuries during booking and intake.
  • Charges against her for assault by threat were later dismissed; she contends there was no probable cause.
  • Defendants move to dismiss state-law claims for lack of timely notice under the Texas Tort Claims Act and Houston Charter.
  • Court grants motion to dismiss state-law claims with prejudice and dismisses City’s §1983 claims for lack of a plausible policy or custom.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether failure to give statutory notice defeats state-law claims Cullingford argues actual notice suffices to waive immunity. City says written notice within 90 days (and 6 months under Act) required. Notice requirements not satisfied; state claims dismissed with prejudice.
Whether the City can be liable under §1983 for a policy or custom Cullingford asserts a pervasive custom of misconduct supports liability. City contends no adequate pleading of a policy or widespread custom, or its causation. No plausible policy or custom shown; §1983 claims against City dismissed.
Whether alleged non-disclosure of video/autopsy evidence is legally relevant Cullingford cites non-disclosure as part of alleged custom. Non-disclosure elements are unrelated to her claims and should be struck. Claims and evidence of non-disclosure struck as irrelevant to the asserted custom.
Whether inadequate training constitutes §1983 liability Cullingford asserts lack of training supports liability. Plaintiff must show deliberate indifference and direct causation; she fails. Inadequate training not plausibly alleged; City’s liability not shown.

Key Cases Cited

  • Connick v. Thompson, 131 S. Ct. 1350 (2011) (municipal liability requires policy or custom; not vicarious liability)
  • Monell v. Dep’t of Social Servs., 436 U.S. 658 (1978) (municipal liability for official policy or custom)
  • Pembaur v. City of Cincinnati, 475 U.S. 469 (1986) (policy or custom can be established by officials with final authority)
  • Bennett v. City of Slidell, 735 F.2d 861 (5th Cir. 1984) (rigorous standards for municipal liability; not for isolated incidents)
  • World Wide Street Preachers Fellowship v. Town of Columbia, 591 F.3d 747 (5th Cir. 2009) (inadequacy of training requires three-part showing)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Cullingford v. City Of Houston
Court Name: District Court, S.D. Texas
Date Published: Mar 20, 2012
Docket Number: 4:11-cv-00523
Court Abbreviation: S.D. Tex.