Crabtree v. Commonwealth
2014 Ky. LEXIS 609
| Ky. | 2014Background
- Crabtree, EKU student with cognitive impairment, downloaded images and videos via Limewire to shock himself.
- In 2008, his computer was brought to Resnet; suspicious filenames prompted campus police involvement and a forensic lab examination.
- Crabtree admitted to downloading some files, including child pornography, and wrote a signed statement acknowledging wrongdoing and attempted deletion.
- Forensic analysis found five videos (one complete, four incomplete) and sixty-two still images suspected of depicting minors; stills found in Windows Vista thumb-cache, not in accessible folders.
- Crabtree was indicted on 67 counts for possession of matter portraying a sexual performance by a minor; the jury acquitted one video, convicted on others and on 65 still-image-related counts, with a five-year sentence per felony count, all concurrent.
- Court of Appeals affirmed videotape convictions but reversed still-image convictions; discretionary review granted to address sufficiency of proof and innocent-possession instruction.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sufficiency of evidence for video convictions | Crabtree lacked knowledge of content; filenames alone insufficient. | Possession did not prove knowledge; cache and incomplete downloads undermine mens rea. | Videos: sufficient evidence of knowing possession; still images: insufficient |
| Innocent-possession instruction for child pornography | Adkins defense of innocent possession should apply to videos and images. | There was evidence of incidental possession; instruction required. | No innocent-possession instruction required for videos; convictions for videos affirmed, still-image convictions reversed |
| Meaning of 'knowingly' possession and jury instructions | Jury should determine if knowledge includes temporary viewing/possession. | Judge should tailor instructions to avoid ambiguity; insufficient evidence of inadvertent possession. | Trial court did not err; instructions conformed to statute |
| Admission/weight of character evidence | Crabtree’s truthfulness evidence should be admitted to counter police characterization. | Character evidence improperly framed; opinion on truthfulness should be limited. | Exclusion deemed harmless; no reversible error |
Key Cases Cited
- Commonwealth v. Benham, 816 S.W.2d 186 (Ky. 1991) (established standard for directed verdict and sufficiency review)
- Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 (U.S. 1979) (directed-verdict standard; rational nexus to guilt)
- Adkins v. Commonwealth, 331 S.W.3d 260 (Ky. 2011) (innocent-possession defense in possession/trafficking context)
- United States v. Kuchinski, 469 F.3d 853 (9th Cir. 2006) (cache possession requires knowledge or dominion; mere presence not enough)
- Romm v. United States, 455 F.3d 990 (9th Cir. 2006) (possession can be based on seeking and controlling images online)
- Kain v. United States, 589 F.3d 945 (8th Cir. 2009) (possession can attach to images found online even if some are in cache or deleted)
- United States v. Dobbs, 629 F.3d 1199 (10th Cir. 2011) (distinguishes cache-based possession; need knowledge of caching process)
- United States v. Figueroa-Lugo, 915 F. Supp. 2d 237 (D.P.R. 2013) (incomplete downloads found on hard drive can support knowing possession)
- Keefer v. United States, 405 Fed. Appx. 955 (6th Cir. 2010) (unallocated space for images; possession not established by mere presence)
