History
  • No items yet
midpage
Cox v. Labor Commission
2017 UT App 175
Utah Ct. App.
2017
Read the full case

Background

  • In May–August 2013 Cox (a maintenance mechanic) experienced back incidents at work, reported increasing pain, and ultimately underwent lumbar surgery after MRIs showed severe spinal canal stenosis and multilevel disc bulging.
  • Cox had prior back injuries (1977 car crash; 2009 ATV accident) with some chronic back complaints but had continued working until 2013; he stopped working after the surgery.
  • Workers Compensation Fund (WCF) denied Cox’s claim, citing preexisting severe degenerative disc disease and asserting no acute findings tied to the claim; WCF’s medical examiner said the 5/7/13 accident did not cause or aggravate Cox’s condition.
  • Cox’s treating surgeon and physician assistant opined the work events worsened symptoms and likely precipitated the need for surgery; an ALJ ordered a medical panel which concluded the May 2013 injury did not cause Cox’s substantial spinal problems though it ‘‘worsened’’ an already developed condition.
  • The ALJ and Labor Commission denied benefits, holding the work incidents were not the medical cause of Cox’s need for surgery; Cox sought judicial review alleging the Commission applied the wrong legal standard for medical causation.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Medical causation standard when an industrial accident aggravates a preexisting condition Cox: causation requires only that the industrial accident be a cause in any degree (de minimis/but-for-type showing); cumulative trauma or minor contribution satisfies medical causation WCF: must show permanent aggravation; temporary exacerbations that return to baseline are insufficient; medical cause must be more than a minimal contribution Court: A claimant must show the industrial accident contributed in any degree, but the aggravation must be permanent (did not return to baseline)
Whether the medical panel and Commission applied correct causation question Cox: panel/Commission focused on whether accident was the (substantial) medical cause of surgery, not whether it contributed in any degree WCF: relied on panel finding that work injuries did not medically cause current condition Court: The ALJ’s panel question and the Commission’s framing were ambiguous/incorrect; panel appears to have required greater-than-de-minimis causation, and Commission applied that incorrect standard
Whether Commission addressed permanence of aggravation Cox: Commission failed to determine if aggravation was permanent or temporary WCF: Commission referenced brief negative effects and concluded no causal relationship Court: Commission’s cursory references were insufficient; it did not clearly decide permanence, so must reconsider under correct standard

Key Cases Cited

  • Allen v. Industrial Commission, 729 P.2d 15 (Utah 1986) (defines medical cause test and asks whether work exertion contributed to injury)
  • Zimmerman v. Industrial Commission, 785 P.2d 1127 (Utah Ct. App. 1989) (distinguishes compensable permanent aggravation from temporary aggravation)
  • Virgin v. Board of Review of Industrial Commission, 803 P.2d 1284 (Utah Ct. App. 1990) (holds temporary aggravation insufficient for permanent disability claims)
  • Provo City v. Utah Labor Commission, 345 P.3d 1242 (Utah 2015) (states general rule that accident must be but-for cause under medical causation test)
  • Washington County School Dist. v. Labor Commission, 358 P.3d 1091 (Utah 2015) (distinguishes issues involving subsequent non-workplace injuries)
  • Covington v. Board of Review of Industrial Commission, 737 P.2d 207 (Utah 1987) (directs remand to Commission to redetermine claim under proper legal standard)

Summary of holding: The court set aside the Commission’s denial, holding the Commission applied an incorrect medical-causation standard (requiring the accident to be the medical cause rather than a contributing cause) and failed to address whether any aggravation was permanent; the case is remanded for reconsideration under the correct standard.

Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Cox v. Labor Commission
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Utah
Date Published: Sep 14, 2017
Citation: 2017 UT App 175
Docket Number: 20150788-CA
Court Abbreviation: Utah Ct. App.