History
  • No items yet
midpage
121 N.E.3d 1205
Mass.
2019
Read the full case

Background

  • Early morning traffic stop of a Honda driven soley by the defendant after the car drifted into oncoming lane; officer asked for license/registration.
  • The car was registered to another person (Francesca Rosario); defendant had a different address; no evidence linking defendant to owner.
  • Defendant opened the glove compartment to retrieve the registration; officer observed a small bag of white powder (appearing to be cocaine) on top of paperwork.
  • After the officer asked about the bag, the defendant covered it with papers; subsequent searches found a digital scale, an unfired 9mm round in the glove box, a 9mm pistol under the passenger seat, and ammunition in the trunk; two car seats and a child’s toy were in the rear.
  • Defendant was acquitted of weapon/ammunition charges and of possession with intent to distribute, but convicted by a jury of simple possession of cocaine; trial judge denied the defendant’s motion for required findings; appellate court reviews sufficiency of evidence.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Was there sufficient evidence of constructive possession of cocaine? The defendant was sole occupant/driver, said the car was "his" (replaced axles), and tried to cover the bag when the officer saw it — showing knowledge and dominion. Mere presence and post-discovery covering are insufficient; no proof defendant knew of the bag beforehand, car not registered to him, no pre-discovery evasive behavior. Reversed: evidence insufficient to prove knowledge required for constructive possession beyond a reasonable doubt.

Key Cases Cited

  • Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 (establishes standard for sufficiency of the evidence review)
  • Commonwealth v. Almeida, 381 Mass. 420 (car alone occupied by defendant not enough when contraband not in plain view)
  • Commonwealth v. Alicea, 410 Mass. 384 (post-discovery reaction alone insufficient; pre-discovery agitation probative)
  • Commonwealth v. Romero, 464 Mass. 648 (presence/ownership of vehicle insufficient without additional incriminating evidence)
  • Commonwealth v. Ortega, 441 Mass. 170 (elements of constructive possession: knowledge and ability/intention to exercise dominion and control)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Commonwealth v. Santana
Court Name: Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Date Published: May 8, 2019
Citations: 121 N.E.3d 1205; 95 Mass. App. Ct. 265; No. 18-P-253
Docket Number: No. 18-P-253
Court Abbreviation: Mass.
Log In