History
  • No items yet
midpage
Commonwealth v. Johnson
423 S.W.3d 718
Ky.
2014
Read the full case

Background

  • Johnson was investigated in 2009 by OAG and Operation UNITE for drug crimes in Powell County.
  • Investigators used a confidential informant for controlled drug buys; evidence included grand jury testimony and video recordings.
  • Two indictments were returned for multiple counts of first-degree trafficking and delivery of drug paraphernalia.
  • Johnson moved to suppress evidence and dismiss indictments, arguing OAG had no jurisdiction under KRS 15.200 and not invited by local officials.
  • Trial court denied the motion, found KRS 218A.240(1) gave OAG authority to arrest for drugs, and Johnson pled guilty with a 10-year sentence.
  • Court of Appeals reversed; this Court granted discretionary review and reversed the Court of Appeals, reinstating the trial court.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether KRS 218A.240(1) grants statewide OAG investigative jurisdiction Johnson: OAG lacks statewide jurisdiction absent invitation Commonwealth: 218A.240(1) authorizes OAG to enforce across Kentucky OAG has statewide investigative jurisdiction under 218A.240(1)
Relation of KRS 15.020/15.200 to OAG investigative authority Johnson: 15.200 requires invitation; limits OAG powers Commonwealth: 15.020/15.200 govern prosecutorial power, not independent investigation 15.020/15.200 do not limit independent OAG investigations
Common law authority of the OAG to investigate across the Commonwealth Johnson: common law grants broader investigative power Commonwealth: common law authority exists but is constrained by statutes OAG possesses common law investigative authority compatible with statutory directives

Key Cases Cited

  • Hearn v. Commonwealth, 80 S.W.3d 432 (Ky. 2002) (de novo statutory interpretation framework)
  • Maynes v. Commonwealth, 361 S.W.3d 922 (Ky. 2012) (intent from statutory language; liberal construction)
  • Stilger v. Flint, 391 S.W.3d 751 (Ky. 2013) (OAG as investigatory body)
  • Schroering, 481 S.W.2d 57 (Ky. 1972) (limits on prosecutorial authority; KRS 15.020)
  • Pound, 408 S.W.2d 10-11 (Ky. 1966) (prosecutorial authority context for KRS 15.200)
  • Johnson v. Commonwealth ex rel. Meredith, 165 S.W.2d 820 (Ky. 1942) (historical view of OAG powers)
  • Strong v. Chandler, 70 S.W.3d 405 (Ky. 2002) (statutory interpretation and powers)
  • George v. Scent, 346 S.W.2d 784 (Ky. 1961) (interpretation of legislative intent)
  • Fox v. Grayson, 317 S.W.3d 1 (Ky. 2010) (expressio unius discussed in statutory construction)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Commonwealth v. Johnson
Court Name: Kentucky Supreme Court
Date Published: Feb 20, 2014
Citation: 423 S.W.3d 718
Docket Number: No. 2012-SC-000402-DG
Court Abbreviation: Ky.