History
  • No items yet
midpage
15 N.E.3d 741
Mass.
2014
Read the full case

Background

  • In 1997 Holmes pleaded guilty to unlawful possession of a controlled substance with intent to distribute and completed the sentence by 1999.
  • In 2003 Holmes pleaded guilty to two firearm offenses and two related offender counts; he was sentenced to two concurrent terms of 12 years to 12 years and 1 day, credited for pretrial confinement.
  • In 2005, while incarcerated for the 2003 convictions, Holmes moved to withdraw the 1997 guilty plea on ineffective assistance grounds; the motion was granted in 2006 and the 1997 complaint was dismissed.
  • In 2011 Holmes, still incarcerated, moved for time served credit under G. L. c. 279, § 33A(6), seeking credit for the vacated 1997 sentence against his 2003 sentences; the Superior Court denied, the Appeals Court reversed and credited the time against the 2003 sentences.
  • The Commonwealth argued Holmes was not entitled to credit and that banking time was implicated; the court held that banking time barred credit when the 1997 sentence was completed before the new crimes, and affirmed the denial.
  • The court distinguished Manning v. Superintendent and held there were no substantive/temporal links between the 1997 and 2003 sentences, so no credit was allowed and banking concerns outweighed any dead-time fairness.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Credit for time served on vacated conviction against later sentences Holmes seeks credit against 2003 sentences Commonwealth denies credit; banking prohibition applies Not entitled to credit; banking prohibition applies
Applicability of banking-time doctrine to unrelated, completed prior sentences Banking does not apply when prior sentence was completed Banking disallows using banked time for unrelated new convictions Banking prohibition controls; no credit allowed

Key Cases Cited

  • Manning v. Superintendent, Mass. Correctional Inst., Norfolk, 372 Mass. 387 (1977) (banking time not allowed for future crimes when sentences are related; dead time issue considered)
  • Commonwealth v. Milton, 427 Mass. 18 (1998) (banking time prevention priority over dead-time fairness)
  • Chalifoux v. Commissioner of Correction, 375 Mass. 424 (1978) (fairness considerations guide credit when no statute governs)
  • Commonwealth v. Holmes, 83 Mass. App. Ct. 737 (2013) (Appeals Court decision creditting vacated sentence against later sentences)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Commonwealth v. Holmes
Court Name: Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Date Published: Sep 12, 2014
Citations: 15 N.E.3d 741; 469 Mass. 1010; SJC 11557
Docket Number: SJC 11557
Court Abbreviation: Mass.
Log In
    Commonwealth v. Holmes, 15 N.E.3d 741