History
  • No items yet
midpage
Commonwealth v. Fantauzzi
AC 15-P-574
| Mass. App. Ct. | Mar 21, 2017
Read the full case

Background

  • Defendant Miguel Fantauzzi sold drugs; met victim Powell in victim's SUV. Shots were fired; Powell died of a chest wound. Defendant also convicted of unlicensed firearm possession.
  • Defendant testified he was threatened inside the SUV (knife at throat, stun gun displayed) and fired in self-defense after being attacked during a drug transaction gone wrong.
  • Commonwealth prosecuted on two theories of second-degree murder: traditional second-degree murder (including self-defense issue) and second-degree felony-murder with predicate felony unlawful possession of a firearm.
  • Trial judge instructed jurors that self-defense did not apply to the felony-murder theory and that felony-murder could be reduced to voluntary manslaughter without considering self-defense; jurors later asked for clarification and judge confirmed this position.
  • Jury convicted the defendant of voluntary manslaughter (lesser included), without indicating whether conviction stemmed from mitigation of traditional murder or reduction of felony-murder.
  • On appeal, defendant argued the judge erred by failing to give a self-defense instruction as to felony-murder and by allowing reduction of felony-murder to manslaughter without considering self-defense; the Appeals Court found reversible error.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument (Commonwealth) Defendant's Argument (Fantauzzi) Held
Whether self-defense is unavailable as a defense to felony-murder generally Model Instructions and precedent hold self-defense inapplicable to felony-murder because underlying felonies typically mark defendant as initiating aggressor Self-defense can apply where defendant was not the initiator and the predicate felony (unlawful possession) is not inherently dangerous Court: General rule not absolute; where defendant is not the initiator and felony is not inherently dangerous, self-defense instruction should be given
Whether judge may instruct that felony-murder can be reduced to voluntary manslaughter without considering self-defense The Commonwealth maintained manslaughter was a lesser-included of traditional murder and, per model, self-defense not a defense to felony-murder Defendant argued reduction of felony-murder to manslaughter without self-defense improperly eliminates his primary defense and was inconsistent with the need to prove conscious disregard for life Court: It was error to tell jury they could reduce felony-murder to manslaughter without considering self-defense in these circumstances
Whether defendant was entitled to self-defense instruction as to felony-murder given the evidence Commonwealth pointed to defendant bringing a gun to the meeting and asserted risks; relied on precedents where initiators could not claim self-defense Defendant pointed to testimony that victim/third party threatened him with a knife and stun gun and that he only fired after being attacked Court: Evidence was sufficient to warrant self-defense instruction as to felony-murder; trial court should have given it
Whether instructional error was harmless Commonwealth argued error harmless because jury also had correct self-defense instruction as to traditional murder and might have relied on that theory Defendant argued primary defense was self-defense and jury verdict could have rested on flawed felony-murder reduction without considering self-defense Court: Error was prejudicial because jury did not specify the theory supporting conviction; reversal required

Key Cases Cited

  • Commonwealth v. Griffith, 404 Mass. 256 (establishes rule that self-defense ordinarily inapplicable where defendant provoked or initiated assault)
  • Commonwealth v. Smith, 459 Mass. 538 (applies rule that self-defense is inapplicable to felony-murder in cases where defendant was initiating aggressor)
  • Commonwealth v. Rogers, 459 Mass. 249 (recognizes circumstances where self-defense instruction may be appropriate despite underlying felony)
  • Commonwealth v. Matchett, 386 Mass. 492 (discusses inherently dangerous felonies and conscious disregard standard for felony-murder)
  • Commonwealth v. Moran, 387 Mass. 644 (addresses conscious disregard requirement for non-inherently dangerous predicate felonies)
  • Commonwealth v. Pike, 428 Mass. 393 (defendant entitled to self-defense instruction when evidence permits reasonable doubt about prerequisites)
  • Commonwealth v. Wadlington, 467 Mass. 192 (on inherently dangerous felony instruction)
  • Commonwealth v. Garner, 59 Mass. App. Ct. 350 (example where unlawful possession predicate led to self-defense instruction)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Commonwealth v. Fantauzzi
Court Name: Massachusetts Appeals Court
Date Published: Mar 21, 2017
Docket Number: AC 15-P-574
Court Abbreviation: Mass. App. Ct.