midpage
Projects
Sign in to see your projects.
39 N.E.3d 427
Mass.
2015
Read the full case

Background

  • In Jan. 2012 the defendant was accused of indecent assault and battery (G. L. c. 265, § 13H) after unwanted sexual touching; at a plea colloquy he admitted to sufficient facts.
  • The judge continued the case without a finding for five years and imposed probationary conditions, including mandatory GPS monitoring under G. L. c. 265, § 47.
  • The defendant moved to remove GPS monitoring, arguing § 47 does not apply to continuances without a finding; the judge denied the motion but stayed GPS while the issue was appealed and reported the legal question to the Appeals Court.
  • The Commonwealth argued the statute’s plain language (use of “probation”/“probationer”) requires GPS for anyone placed on probation for a defined sex offense.
  • The defendant and amici contended § 47 was meant to apply only to convicted sex offenders (those required to register/classify), and that continuances without a finding do not produce a conviction or sex-offender status.
  • The Supreme Judicial Court transferred the case and held § 47 does not apply to defendants placed on a continuance without a finding, vacating the GPS order and remanding for further proceedings.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether G. L. c. 265, § 47 (mandatory GPS as term of probation for listed “sex offense”) applies to a defendant placed on a continuance without a finding after admission to sufficient facts § 47 uses “probation”/“probationer” broadly; any person placed on probation for a listed sex offense must have GPS monitoring § 47 targets convicted sex offenders (those required to register/classify under G. L. c. 6, § 178C); a continuance without a finding is not a conviction and thus § 47 does not apply No — § 47 applies only to sex offenders (i.e., convicted or otherwise within the statutory definition); continuance without a finding does not create sex-offender status, so mandatory GPS under § 47 does not apply

Key Cases Cited

  • Commonwealth v. Raposo, 453 Mass. 739 (clarified § 47 does not apply to pretrial probation and discussed scope of statute)
  • Commonwealth v. Hanson H., 464 Mass. 807 (held § 47 does not apply to juveniles adjudicated delinquent)
  • Commonwealth v. Villalobos, 437 Mass. 797 (admission plus continuance without a finding is not a conviction)
  • Commonwealth v. Mosher, 455 Mass. 811 (continuance without a finding ≈ straight probation but not a conviction unless later guilty finding)
  • Commonwealth v. Cory, 454 Mass. 559 (discussed GPS monitoring as a severe, affirmative restraint)
  • Doe, Sex Offender Registry Bd. No. 8725 v. Sex Offender Registry Bd., 450 Mass. 780 (GPS and registration burdens; characterization of GPS monitoring)
  • Burno v. Commissioner of Correction, 399 Mass. 111 (related-statutory interpretation principle: identical language in related statutes should receive consistent meaning)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Commonwealth v. Doe
Court Name: Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Date Published: Oct 22, 2015
Citations: 39 N.E.3d 427; 473 Mass. 76; 2015 WL 6181007; SJC-11861
Docket Number: SJC-11861
Court Abbreviation: Mass.
Log In