History
  • No items yet
midpage
Commonwealth v. Callahan
101 A.3d 118
| Pa. Super. Ct. | 2014
Read the full case

Background

  • On December 17, 2008, Callahan robbed a victim at her car, taking $200; victim described a black hat, gray coat, and goatee.
  • Appellant was identified by the victim at the station and at trial; he presented a teenage alibi witness.
  • Appellant was convicted of robbery, theft by unlawful taking, making terroristic threats, and recklessly endangering another person on April 19, 2010; sentenced to 10–20 years on June 3, 2010.
  • First PCRA petition led to reinstatement of rights to file post-sentence motions and direct appeal nunc pro tunc; subsequent appellate proceedings occurred.
  • Appellant filed a second PCRA petition on April 30, 2013; the PCRA court denied relief after an evidentiary hearing.
  • This Superior Court held the second PCRA petition untimely, final judgment date April 23, 2012, and no statutory exception applied; thus no jurisdiction to consider merits.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether Callahan’s PCRA petition was timely Callahan due to nunc pro tunc reinstatement Petition untimely under 42 Pa.C.S.A. § 9545(b) Untimely; no applicable exceptions; petition denied

Key Cases Cited

  • Commonwealth v. Turner, 73 A.3d 1283 (Pa. Super. 2013) (timeliness restarts on nunc pro tunc direct-appeal reinstatement)
  • Commonwealth v. Donaghy, 33 A.3d 12 (Pa. Super. 2011) (timing and nunc pro tunc considerations for PCRA petitions)
  • Commonwealth v. Lark, 746 A.2d 585 (Pa. 2000) (pending PCRA appeals tolling for subsequent petitions; one-year limit applies after final judgment)
  • Commonwealth v. Ali, 86 A.3d 173 (Pa. 2014) (doctrines of tolling and equitable tolling not allowed to extend time)
  • Commonwealth v. Robinson, 837 A.2d 1157 (Pa. 2003) (strict application of time-bar provisions with enumerated exceptions)
  • Commonwealth v. Hall, 771 A.2d 1232 (Pa. 2001) (limits on equitable tolling in PCRA context)
  • Commonwealth v. Gandy, 38 A.3d 899 (Pa. Super. 2012) (timeliness question can be raised sua sponte; jurisdictional concern)
  • Commonwealth v. Turner, 73 A.3d 1283 (Pa. Super. 2013) (reiterates timeliness principles for PCRA petitions)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Commonwealth v. Callahan
Court Name: Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Sep 23, 2014
Citation: 101 A.3d 118
Docket Number: 273 WDA 2014
Court Abbreviation: Pa. Super. Ct.