History
  • No items yet
midpage
981 N.E.2d 200
Mass. App. Ct.
2013
Read the full case

Background

  • Defendant was charged by complaint with intimidation of a witness after a threat spoken in court; the threat followed a guilty finding but before sentencing.
  • The complaint alleged that on June 22, 2011, the defendant leaned behind his attorney, stated, “I’ll see you on the street,” and the statement was made in Courtroom 19.
  • Arraignment occurred on July 21, 2011, after which the defendant moved to dismiss for lack of probable cause.
  • The motion judge found probable cause for the threats but not for intimidation of a witness, and dismissed the complaint.
  • The Commonwealth appealed, arguing the application established probable cause for intimidation; the issue is whether the complaint itself contained sufficient evidence to justify issuance.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether the complaint established probable cause to believe intimidation occurred Commonwealth: yes; the time, place, and circumstances implied intent to interfere Grasso: no; lacked sufficient intent showing obstruction of the proceeding Probable cause existed; the complaint adequately showed intent given context
Whether a four-corners review governs a lack of probable cause without an evidentiary hearing Commonwealth: proper four-corners approach suffices Grasso: must consider evidentiary hearing or broader inquiry Four-corners review appropriate; dismissal error should be reversed

Key Cases Cited

  • Commonwealth v. Gallant, 453 Mass. 535 (Mass. 2009) (probable cause standard for 3(g)(2) is comparable to grand jury standard; not required to prove every element at complaint stage)
  • Commonwealth v. McCarthy, 385 Mass. 160 (Mass. 1982) (probable cause and arrest identity sufficiency; four-corners approach in complaints)
  • Commonwealth v. O’Dell, 392 Mass. 445 (Mass. 1984) (proof standard for probable cause and required information to arrest)
  • Commonwealth v. Black, 403 Mass. 675 (Mass. 1989) (four-corners rule for complaint dismissal)
  • Commonwealth v. DiBennadetto, 436 Mass. 310 (Mass. 2002) (authority on dismissal standards for complaints)
  • Commonwealth v. Lester L., 445 Mass. 250 (Mass. 2005) (probable cause standard under 3(g)(2) guidance)
  • Commonwealth v. McCreary, 45 Mass. App. Ct. 797 (Mass. App. Ct. 1998) (intent inferred from context; circumstantial proof common in motive)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Commonwealth v. Bell
Court Name: Massachusetts Appeals Court
Date Published: Jan 8, 2013
Citations: 981 N.E.2d 200; 83 Mass. App. Ct. 61; 2013 Mass. App. LEXIS 2; No. 12-P-284
Docket Number: No. 12-P-284
Court Abbreviation: Mass. App. Ct.
Log In