History
  • No items yet
midpage
Commonwealth v. Baye
462 Mass. 246
| Mass. | 2012
Read the full case

Background

  • Arson-fire spree in Northampton; defendant questioned multiple times, with a 10-hour January 4, 2010 interrogation that was recorded; Miranda warnings given but no signed waiver; defendant invoked right to counsel after initial questioning; troopers used minimization, mischaracterization of law, and assurances of leniency to pressure confession; key issue is whether statements were voluntary or tainted by improper police tactics; court finds suppression appropriate and remands for further proceedings.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Custodial status when invoking counsel Meets custodial custody indicators due to duration and accusatory tone Was not custody when invoked or was free to leave Custody found; invocation tainted interrogation (custodial status).
Voluntariness standard applied to the statements Voluntariness shown beyond reasonable doubt Coercive tactics undermined free will Statements suppressed as involuntary.
Minimization and implied leniency promises Promised leniency and minimized seriousness were acceptable Promises manipulated defendant’s decision to confess Promises and minimization contributed to coercion; suppression affirmed.
Assurances that statements would not be used against him Assurances were consistent with cooperative defense Assurances rendered statements involuntary Such assurances rendered statements involuntary.

Key Cases Cited

  • Commonwealth v. Meehan, 377 Mass. 552 (Mass. 1979) (heavy burden to prove voluntariness; totality of circumstances)
  • Commonwealth v. Novo, 442 Mass. 262 (Mass. 2004) (false promises and coercive tactics in interrogation)
  • Commonwealth v. DiGiambattista, 442 Mass. 423 (Mass. 2004) (minimization and assurances of leniency can render confession involuntary)
  • Commonwealth v. Tremblay, 460 Mass. 199 (Mass. 2011) (coercion analysis; limits of isolated improper conduct)
  • Commonwealth v. Durand, 457 Mass. 574 (Mass. 2010) (burden to show not overborne; relevance of defendant’s characteristics)
  • Commonwealth v. Hilton, 450 Mass. 173 (Mass. 2007) (custodial status and interrogation strategy; pre- and post-warning considerations)
  • Edwards v. Arizona, 451 U.S. 477 (U.S. 1981) (right to counsel; interruption of interrogation after request)
  • Dickerson v. United States, 530 U.S. 428 (U.S. 2000) (standard for voluntariness and Miranda procedures)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Commonwealth v. Baye
Court Name: Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Date Published: May 21, 2012
Citation: 462 Mass. 246
Court Abbreviation: Mass.