History
  • No items yet
midpage
Commonwealth v. Baker
621 Pa. 401
| Pa. | 2013
Read the full case

Background

  • Appellant previously convicted of possession of child pornography (2001), completed intermediate punishment in 2006; in 2007 NCMEC cybertip led to search of his residence and seizure of a computer and DVDs containing numerous images and 29 video clips of children in sexual acts.
  • Forensic evidence showed sharing of illicit material online; Appellant was charged and convicted by jury of 29 counts of sexual abuse of children — child pornography (18 Pa.C.S. § 6312(d)(1)) and one count of criminal use of a communication facility.
  • Commonwealth gave notice it would seek the recidivist mandatory minimum under 42 Pa.C.S. § 9718.2; Appellant was adjudicated a Sexually Violent Predator at an SVP hearing.
  • Trial court imposed concurrent mandatory 25–50 year terms on the child-pornography counts (plus concurrent 1–7 years on the communications count) and lifetime registration; sentencing produced effectively a long indeterminate term with parole possible after the 25-year minimum.
  • Appellant challenged the 25-year mandatory minimum as grossly disproportionate under the Eighth Amendment and Article I, § 13 of the Pennsylvania Constitution; the Superior Court affirmed and the Pennsylvania Supreme Court granted review.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument (Baker) Defendant's Argument (Commonwealth) Held
Whether 42 Pa.C.S. § 9718.2’s 25-year mandatory minimum for a second possession conviction is grossly disproportionate under the Eighth Amendment / PA Constitution Baker: Possession is a non-violent, possessory offense with no direct contact; 25 years is tantamount to life and disproportionate (especially compared to mandatory minima for forcible child rape). Commonwealth: Possession of child pornography perpetuates demand, enables production and grooming, and is a grave, recidivist offense—legislature rationally imposed severe recidivist penalties to protect children. Court: No inference of gross disproportionality on threshold comparison; statute constitutional under Eighth Amendment; affirmed.

Key Cases Cited

  • Solem v. Helm, 463 U.S. 277 (U.S. 1983) (articulated three-prong proportionality test for Eighth Amendment review)
  • Harmelin v. Michigan, 501 U.S. 957 (U.S. 1991) (gross disproportionality standard; Kennedy opinion emphasized threshold comparison)
  • Rummel v. Estelle, 445 U.S. 263 (U.S. 1980) (upheld life sentence with parole possibility for recidivist nonviolent felonies)
  • Ewing v. California, 538 U.S. 11 (U.S. 2003) (upheld 25-to-life under three-strikes statute for property offense)
  • New York v. Ferber, 458 U.S. 747 (U.S. 1982) (child pornography may be proscribed without First Amendment protection because of harms to children)
  • Osborne v. Ohio, 495 U.S. 103 (U.S. 1990) (upheld laws criminalizing possession of child pornography; recognized supply–demand rationale)
  • Commonwealth v. Davidson, 595 Pa. 1 (Pa. 2007) (upheld §6312 against vagueness/overbreadth and recognized penalizing possession to reduce production)
  • Commonwealth v. Spells, 417 Pa.Super. 233 (Pa. Super. 1992) (applied Solem three-part test in Pennsylvania proportionality review)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Commonwealth v. Baker
Court Name: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Oct 30, 2013
Citation: 621 Pa. 401
Court Abbreviation: Pa.