History
  • No items yet
midpage
Com. v. Lee, F.
3023 EDA 2016
| Pa. Super. Ct. | Sep 19, 2017
Read the full case

Background

  • In 1984 Frank Lee was convicted of two counts each of rape and robbery, and PIC, for a 1982 armed sexual assault and robbery; he received an aggregate 25–50 year sentence.
  • Lee’s direct appeal concluded in 1987; his judgment of sentence became final on May 9, 1987 after the time to seek allowance of appeal expired.
  • Over the years Lee filed multiple collateral petitions. In 2014 he filed a PCRA-style motion claiming his sentence was illegal under the mandatory minimum in 42 Pa.C.S. § 9712(a).
  • The trial court treated the 2014 filing as a PCRA petition, reinstated Lee’s collateral-appeal rights nunc pro tunc, but denied the substantive PCRA claims as untimely on August 23, 2016.
  • Lee appealed pro se, arguing § 9712’s mandatory minimum is unconstitutional under Alleyne and thus his sentence is illegal.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument (Lee) Defendant's Argument (Commonwealth) Held
Whether Lee’s Alleyne-based challenge to § 9712 renders his sentence illegal and entitles him to relief Alleyne requires jury findings for facts that increase mandatory minimums; § 9712 is therefore unconstitutional and his sentence must be vacated Alleyne does not apply retroactively on collateral review; Lee’s petition is untimely and fails to invoke a timeliness exception Petition untimely; Alleyne-based claim does not overcome PCRA time bar; court lacked jurisdiction to grant relief
Whether an after-recognized constitutional right exception saves the untimely petition Lee invoked the after-recognized-right exception under 42 Pa.C.S. § 9545(b)(1)(iii) relying on Alleyne Commonwealth relied on Pennsylvania precedent holding Alleyne is not retroactive for collateral review Alleyne is not retroactive under Pennsylvania law; exception not satisfied

Key Cases Cited

  • Commonwealth v. Taylor, 67 A.3d 1245 (Pa. Super. 2013) (standard for reviewing PCRA denials and timeliness principles)
  • Commonwealth v. Rainey, 928 A.2d 215 (Pa. 2007) (standard of review citation in PCRA context)
  • Alleyne v. United States, 133 S. Ct. 2151 (2013) (holding that facts that increase mandatory minimums must be found by a jury)
  • Commonwealth v. Valentine, 101 A.3d 801 (Pa. Super. 2014) (holding § 9712(a) unconstitutional under Alleyne)
  • Commonwealth v. Washington, 142 A.3d 810 (Pa. 2016) (holding Alleyne does not apply retroactively on collateral review)
  • Commonwealth v. Riggle, 119 A.3d 1058 (Pa. Super. 2015) (concluding Alleyne does not satisfy the PCRA’s after-recognized-right timeliness exception)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Com. v. Lee, F.
Court Name: Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Sep 19, 2017
Docket Number: 3023 EDA 2016
Court Abbreviation: Pa. Super. Ct.