History
  • No items yet
midpage
407 S.W.3d 485
Tex. App.
2013
Read the full case

Background

  • Yeng owned 100% of Golden Star; Zous sought to buy stock via two agreements.
  • First Agreement (Dec 2006/Mar 5, 2007) required payments and covenants with future stock sale; reports attached.
  • Second Agreement (Mar 19, 2007) created partnership between Eve and James; no James signature but acted for partnership.
  • Second Agreement lacked warranties/reports present in First Agreement; included merger clause.
  • Accounts receivable/payable reports from First Agreement were disclosed; discrepancy later surfaced after Eve took over Golden Star.
  • Trial court awarded $350,600 plus fees to Zous; on appeal court modified to $180,000 and affirmed as modified.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Damages: improper recovery under two measures Yeng argues damages double-recovered Zous failed to elect between measures Yes; court sustained and deleted second measure
False representation of past/existing material fact Zous relied on misrepresentations in First Agreement Second Agreement merger barred First Agreement claims Yes; evidence supports misrepresentation claim despite merger clause
Evidence sufficiency for statutory fraud and reliance Zous proved reliance on false reports Evidence insufficient or justifiable reliance lacking Yes; evidence legally and factually sufficient for statutory-fraud finding

Key Cases Cited

  • City of Keller v. Wilson, 168 S.W.3d 802 (Tex. 2005) (standards for legal sufficiency on appeal)
  • Leyendecker & Assocs., Inc. v. Wechter, 683 S.W.2d 369 (Tex. 1984) (recognizes benefit-of-the-bargain damages measure)
  • Osterberg v. Peca, 12 S.W.3d 31 (Tex. 2000) (unobjected-to jury instruction standards on sufficiency review)
  • Maritime Overseas Corp. v. Ellis, 971 S.W.2d 402 (Tex. 1998) (fact-finder credibility and weighing evidence)
  • Italian Cowboy Partners, Ltd. v. Prudential Ins. Co. of America, 341 S.W.3d 323 (Tex. 2011) (merger clause does not bar fraudulent-inducement claims)
  • Waite Hill Servs., Inc. v. World Class Metal Works, Inc., 959 S.W.2d 182 (Tex. 1998) (double recovery prohibition in damages)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Clement Yeng v. Eve Zou and Jian Zhong Zou
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Texas
Date Published: Jul 25, 2013
Citations: 407 S.W.3d 485; 2013 WL 3864320; 2013 Tex. App. LEXIS 9166; 14-11-00819-CV
Docket Number: 14-11-00819-CV
Court Abbreviation: Tex. App.
Log In