History
  • No items yet
midpage
155 Conn.App. 298
Conn. App. Ct.
2015
Read the full case

Background

  • Marital dissolution after a 29-year marriage; no pronounced fault by either party.
  • Plaintiff Gina Cimino, age 54, is well-educated (MBA) with $37,000 claimed earning capacity and prior home duties since 1990; defendant Joseph Cimino is an IRS employee earning $119,548.
  • During the divorce, plaintiff withdrew $129,000 from joint family accounts.
  • The trial court valued the marital home at $575,000, with the home owned outright and needing substantial interior/exterior repairs.
  • The court awarded defendant exclusive possession of the home, ordered $600 weekly alimony for 10 years, and divided retirement/retirement-like accounts (plaintiff received thrift plan ~$124,000 and an IRA ~$11,216; defendant received the retirement fund).
  • The factual record included competing appraisals (575k vs 750k) and testimony about needed repairs; the court chose the lower appraisal and proceeded with its asset division.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether the marital home was properly valued at $575,000. Cimino argues the value should be higher. Cimino contends the court properly used the admitted appraisal. Value supported by appraisal; not abuse of discretion.
Whether alimony of $600/week for ten years was appropriate. Cimino seeks higher/alimony for longer duration. Husband contends court acted within discretion. Alimony within statutory factors and not an abuse of discretion.
Whether one-half of the defendant’s retirement accounts should have been awarded to Cimino. Cimino claims equal division of thrift plan and retirement fund. Court allocated assets consistent with statutory criteria. Court did not abuse discretion; proper division of retirement assets.

Key Cases Cited

  • Keenan v. Casillo, 149 Conn. App. 642 (2014) (abuse of discretion standard in domestic relations)
  • Brown v. Brown, 130 Conn. App. 522 (2011) (consideration of statutory criteria in alimony/property)
  • Desai v. Desai, 119 Conn. App. 224 (2010) (appraisal/evidence weighing in valuation)
  • Porter v. Porter, 61 Conn. App. 791 (2001) (trial court discretion in property valuation)
  • Cunningham v. Cunningham, 140 Conn. App. 676 (2013) (retirement assets division discretion)
  • Kunajukr v. Kunajukr, 83 Conn. App. 478 (2004) (broad discretion in dissolution financial orders)
  • Rivnak v. Rivnak, 99 Conn. App. 326 (2007) (broad discretion in alimony decisions)
  • Giacomo v. Cimino, N/A (N/A) (not cited in text)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Cimino v. Cimino
Court Name: Connecticut Appellate Court
Date Published: Feb 3, 2015
Citations: 155 Conn.App. 298; 109 A.3d 546; AC35945
Docket Number: AC35945
Court Abbreviation: Conn. App. Ct.
Log In
    Cimino v. Cimino, 155 Conn.App. 298