Christine Soave v. Barnes Real Estate Holdings LLC
357196
| Mich. Ct. App. | May 19, 2022Background
- Plaintiff Christine Soave slipped on ice while walking from a Belle Tire store to her parked car on a cold, snowy November day; store surveillance showed ice and some snow near the entrance and driveway.
- Soave testified there was snow but no ice when she entered; about 45 minutes later she fell on a "big spot" of ice on the same path; she acknowledged a dry area on the route but said it was blocked by another person.
- Belle Tire’s manager had an employee spread salt on the approach sidewalk before the store opened.
- Defendants named included Barnes Real Estate (dismissed by stipulation), Belle Tire Distributors, Backer Landscaping (snow/ice contractor), and Premier Lawn Care (subcontractor); Soave dismissed Barnes and did not challenge summary disposition for Premier on appeal.
- The circuit court granted summary disposition under MCR 2.116(C)(10) to Belle Tire, Backer, and Premier; on appeal the Court of Appeals affirmed.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether the ice was open and obvious | Soave: it was "nearly invisible black ice" and not reasonably discoverable | Belle Tire: weather, visible snow/wet path and others' observations provided obvious indicia of ice | Court: Ice was open and obvious given weather and wet conditions; summary disposition affirmed |
| Whether the hazard was effectively unavoidable | Soave: the ice was unavoidable on her path to her car | Belle Tire: invitee not compelled to confront hazard; no evidence of compulsion or lack of safe alternative | Court: No compulsion shown; Hoffner rule controls and Livings (employment-entry exception) does not apply; held not effectively unavoidable |
| Whether Soave preserved/argued claims against Backer Landscaping on appeal | Soave presented no appellate argument against Backer | Backer: summary disposition proper | Court: Soave abandoned claims against Backer by failing to brief them; affirmed |
| Nuisance claim | Soave raised nuisance below | Defendants: moved for summary disposition | Court: Nuisance not argued on appeal and therefore not pursued (abandoned) |
Key Cases Cited
- Janson v Sajewski Funeral Home, Inc., 486 Mich 934 (black ice is open and obvious where weather and other indicia of hazard are present)
- Jeffrey-Moise v Williamsburg Towne Houses Coop, Inc., 336 Mich App 616 (wet surfaces can provide notice of possible ice)
- Hoffner v Lanctoe, 492 Mich 450 (effective-unavoidability requires compulsion; ordinary invitees are not compelled)
- Estate of Livings v Sage’s Investment Group, LLC, 507 Mich 328 (created narrow employment-entry exception to effective-unavoidability)
- DeFrain v State Farm Mut Auto Ins Co, 491 Mich 359 (describes when an appellate order may carry precedential effect)
