History
  • No items yet
midpage
2013 Ohio 252
Ohio Ct. App.
2013
Read the full case

Background

  • Chase filed a foreclosure action against Gersten in 2009 in Ross County; case proceeded to summary judgment on August 15, 2011 and foreclosure decree on August 31, 2011.
  • Gersten moved for a new trial on September 14–15, 2011, and commenced appellate proceedings in Case Nos. 11CA3281 and 11CA3291.
  • This court dismissed 11CA3281 on March 27, 2012 for lack of perfecting the appeal; 11CA3291 was dismissed for untimeliness in December 2011.
  • Gersten filed the present appeal on February 24, 2012, attempting to challenge the summary judgment and the denial of her new-trial motion.
  • The appellate court concluded it lacked jurisdiction to review the assignments of error, and dismissed the appeal.
  • Judgment entry states the appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction and costs are taxed against Gersten.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether the appeal is timely Chase/Chase entities contend untimely filing. Gersten argues a timely appeal from denial of new trial and/or from summary judgment. Appeal untimely; lack of jurisdiction.
Whether the denial of the motion for a new trial is reviewable Motion for new trial is a nullity in a summary-judgment context. New-trial denial can be appealed in proper circumstances. Motion for a new trial is a nullity; no appellate review.
Whether Gersten could appeal the summary-judgment judgment We must review the summary judgment on its merits. Appeal from summary judgment was untimely under App.R. 4(A). Appeal from summary judgment untimely; lack of jurisdiction.

Key Cases Cited

  • L.A. & D., Inc. v. Bd. of Lake Cty. Commrs., 67 Ohio St.2d 384 (Ohio 1981) (summary-judgment proceedings not trials; a new-trial motion is a nullity)
  • Napier v. Napier, 182 Ohio App.3d 672 (4th Dist. 2009) (nullity of erroneous post-judgment motions and lack of appealability)
  • Pitts v. Ohio Dept. of Transp., 67 Ohio St.2d 378 (Ohio 1981) (timeliness requirement for notices of appeal is jurisdictional)
  • Burriss v. Burriss, 2010-Ohio-6116 (4th Dist. 2010) (nullity and lack of jurisdiction for improper filings)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Chase v. Gersten
Court Name: Ohio Court of Appeals
Date Published: Jan 23, 2013
Citations: 2013 Ohio 252; 12CA3314
Docket Number: 12CA3314
Court Abbreviation: Ohio Ct. App.
Log In
    Chase v. Gersten, 2013 Ohio 252