History
  • No items yet
midpage
412 S.W.3d 794
Tex. App.
2013
Read the full case

Background

  • Appellant Lewis was convicted of driving while intoxicated (DWI) and sentenced to 90 days in jail, suspended for nine months, with a $500 fine.
  • Officer Smith investigated a hit-and-run; an eyewitness described a small gray SUV colliding with a parked car.
  • Appellant sat in the passenger seat when her fiancé admitted responsibility but then recanted and said appellant drove.
  • Appellant admitted drinking, and Smith detected an odor of alcohol during a consensual encounter.
  • Smith transported appellant to another officer for sobriety testing; appellant was handcuffed prior to transport.
  • Appellant moved to suppress evidence, arguing unlawful detention/arrest; the trial court denied the motion.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether appellant was unlawfully seized at the scene. Lewis Lewis No legal error; encounter was consensual at first, not a seizure.
Whether warrantless arrest was justified under article 14.03(a)(1). Smith had probable cause and found appellant in a suspicious place. Arrest lacked justification under statutory exception. Appellant was lawfully arrested under art. 14.03(a)(1) based on probable cause and suspicious place.

Key Cases Cited

  • Maxwell v. State, 73 S.W.3d 278 (Tex.Crim.App. 2002) (deference to trial court's factual findings in suppression rulings; standard of review)
  • Guzman v. State, 955 S.W.2d 85 (Tex.Crim.App. 1997) (de novo review of legal determinations in suppression rulings)
  • Moore v. State, 55 S.W.3d 652 (Tex.App. — San Antonio 2001) (factors for distinguishing detention from arrest)
  • Johnson v. State, 912 S.W.2d 227 (Tex.Crim.App. 1995) (reasonable person standard for consensual encounters and detentions)
  • Dyar v. State, 125 S.W.3d 460 (Tex.Crim.App. 2003) (totality-of-circumstances test for 14.03(a)(1) arrest; suspicious place)
  • Swain v. State, 181 S.W.3d 359 (Tex.Crim.App. 2005) (suspicious place analysis and exigency considerations)
  • Banda v. State, 317 S.W.3d 903 (Tex.App. — Houston [14th Dist.] 2010) (hit-and-run context supporting DWI suspicion)
  • Sandoval v. State, 35 S.W.3d 763 (Tex.App. — El Paso 2000) (time-sensitivity of testing for intoxication)
  • Perez v. State, 2010 Tex. App. LEXIS 6984 (Tex.App. — Waco 2010) (probable cause based on admissions and sobriety indicators)
  • Cribley v. State, 2005 Tex. App. LEXIS 6078 (Tex.App. — San Antonio 2005) (probable cause based on admission and odor of alcohol)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Caroline Elise Lewis v. State
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Texas
Date Published: Sep 30, 2013
Citations: 412 S.W.3d 794; 2013 Tex. App. LEXIS 12265; 2013 WL 5459593; 07-12-00488-CR
Docket Number: 07-12-00488-CR
Court Abbreviation: Tex. App.
Log In
    Caroline Elise Lewis v. State, 412 S.W.3d 794