C.R. v. State
73 So. 3d 825
| Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | 2011Background
- C.R. brought a knife to his middle school and asked another student to hold it for protection.
- C.R. was charged by petition for juvenile delinquency with possession of a weapon on school property under 790.115(2), Florida Statutes (2008).
- The weapon definition in 790.001(13) excludes a common pocketknife, plastic knife, or blunt-bladed table knife from being a weapon.
- The trial court denied a motion for judgment of dismissal, finding the knife did not qualify as a common pocketknife.
- On appeal, the issue is whether the knife falls within the common pocketknife exception; the court concludes the knife is not distinguishable from a common pocketknife and reverses for dismissal.
- The case remands to enter a judgment of dismissal.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether the knife is a common pocketknife under 790.001(13). | C.R. is a folding knife with blade ≤4 inches, thus a common pocketknife. | The knife has features that may distinguish it as a weapon, not a common pocketknife. | Yes; the knife is not a common pocketknife; reversal and dismissal |
Key Cases Cited
- L.B. v. State, 700 So.2d 370 (Fla.1997) (definition of common pocketknife and blade-length considerations)
- J.D.L.R. v. State, 701 So.2d 626 (Fla.3d DCA 1997) (knife with weapon-like features may fall outside common pocketknife exception)
- K.H. v. State, 29 So.3d 426 (Fla.5th DCA 2010) (distinguishing a non-ordinary knife from common pocketknife based on design features)
- R.E. v. State, 13 So.3d 97 (Fla.4th DCA 2009) (de novo review of denial of dismissal in juvenile proceedings)
- T.L.T. v. State, 53 So.3d 1100 (Fla.4th DCA 2011) (standard for reviewing denial of judgment of dismissal)
