History
  • No items yet
midpage
Brock v. Dunning
288 Neb. 909
| Neb. | 2014
Read the full case

Background

  • Brock, a Douglas County deputy sheriff, was terminated for untruthful conduct after a 2009 disciplinary process.
  • He had previously alleged racial profiling by a K-9 unit supervisor and reported concerns to supervisors in 2001–2004.
  • Brock’s termination occurred June 10, 2009; the Merit Commission affirmed the termination in 2010.
  • In 2010 Brock filed this action alleging wrongful discharge in retaliation for workers’ compensation claims and three §1983 theories.
  • The district court granted summary judgment on all claims, holding Brock failed to satisfy the Political Subdivisions Tort Claims Act and failed to prove triable §1983 issues.
  • This appeal challenges those summary judgments as to both the PTCA-based bar and the §1983 theories.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether Brock’s tort claim is barred by notices under the PTCA Brock argues timely written notice was not provided Dunning/Douglas County contends notice deadline was met or cannot be met Bar applies; claim barred under §13-919(1)
Whether there was a policy or custom supporting §1983 liability for property rights Brock claimed a policy or custom deprived workers’ compensation rights No official policy or continuing custom shown No evidence of policy/custom; no §1983 liability
Whether Brock’s First Amendment retaliation claim is supported by protected speech Speech about racial profiling was protected and causally linked to termination Speech not sufficiently connected; same-decision defense applies Protected speech established, but same-decision defense defeats liability
Whether Brock’s surveillance claim violated privacy under 14th Amendment due process Surveillance was intrusive and violated privacy rights Surveillance occurred in public places; no privacy violation No violation; summary judgment for appellees on privacy claim

Key Cases Cited

  • Manning v. Dakota Cty. Sch. Dist., 279 Neb. 740 (Neb. 2010) (establishes Monell/Pembaur framework for municipal liability under §1983)
  • Pembaur v. Cincinnati, 475 U.S. 469 (U.S. 1986) (local officials' liability requires official policy or final authority to establish policy)
  • Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Services, 436 U.S. 658 (U.S. 1978) (municipal liability requires official policy or widespread custom)
  • Lane v. Franks, 134 S. Ct. 2369 (U.S. 2014) (public employee speaking as citizen on matter of public concern)
  • Carney v. Miller, 287 Neb. 400 (Neb. 2014) (public concern balancing factors for employee speech)
  • Cox v. Civil Serv. Comm. of Douglas Cty., 259 Neb. 1013 (Neb. 2000) (test for protected speech and balancing against employer interests)
  • Jackson v. Morris Communications Corp., 265 Neb. 423 (Neb. 2003) (common-law tort of retaliatory discharge for workers’ comp claims)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Brock v. Dunning
Court Name: Nebraska Supreme Court
Date Published: Aug 29, 2014
Citation: 288 Neb. 909
Docket Number: S-13-647
Court Abbreviation: Neb.