Brewer v. State
301 Ga. 819
Ga.2017Background
- On December 13, 2013, Brewer and victim Larry Strickland argued over a $100 loan; Brewer grabbed a handgun, chased Strickland, and shot him; witnesses testified Strickland was unarmed and Brewer stole money from the victim and fled.
- Brewer was arrested 10 days later; he testified at trial claiming self-defense, asserting he felt a gun on Strickland during the confrontation. Witness testimony contradicted Brewer’s account.
- Brewer was indicted for malice murder, felony murder (vacated by operation of law), aggravated assault (merged at sentencing), and possession of a firearm during the commission of a crime; a jury convicted on all counts.
- Brewer moved for a mistrial after a police officer testified the search for Brewer involved checking "booking information," but the trial court denied the motion and offered a curative instruction which Brewer’s counsel declined.
- Brewer sought to testify that Strickland had arranged a prior murder years earlier; the trial court sustained the State’s objection and excluded that testimony. Brewer later challenged both the refusal of a mistrial and his counsel’s decision declining the curative instruction as ineffective assistance.
- The trial court sentenced Brewer to life without parole for malice murder and five consecutive years for the firearm conviction; Brewer’s motion for new trial was denied and he appealed.
Issues
| Issue | Brewer's Argument | State's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether denial of mistrial for witness mentioning "booking information" was error | The mention introduced impermissible character/criminal-record evidence and warranted mistrial | The comment was inadvertent, curable by instruction, and Brewer waived complaint by refusing instruction | Denial not reversible; Brewer waived complaint by declining curative instruction and court did not abuse discretion |
| Whether counsel was ineffective for declining curative instruction | Trial counsel’s refusal was deficient and prejudiced Brewer | Counsel made a reasonable strategy choice to avoid highlighting the remark; no prejudice given overwhelming evidence | No ineffective assistance — counsel’s decision was within reasonable trial strategy and not prejudicial |
| Whether exclusion of evidence of alleged prior violent act by victim was reversible error | Excluding testimony about victim’s alleged prior arranged murder harmed Brewer’s self-defense claim | The excluded evidence lacked specificity and was cumulative; overwhelming eyewitness evidence supported conviction | Any error was harmless given strong eyewitness evidence; no reversal required |
| Whether evidence sufficed to support convictions | Brewer implied self-defense; disputed facts | Witnesses saw unarmed victim and Brewer shoot him; evidence supported convictions | Evidence sufficient under Jackson v. Virginia to sustain convictions |
Key Cases Cited
- Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 (establishes sufficiency-of-evidence standard under due process)
- Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (two-prong ineffective assistance of counsel test)
- Rucker v. State, 293 Ga. 116 (trial-court denial of mistrial for admission of bad-character evidence reviewed for abuse of discretion)
- Bunnell v. State, 292 Ga. 253 (curative instructions are adequate remedy for inadvertent references to prior convictions)
- Pickren v. State, 272 Ga. 421 (defendant who declines curative instruction waives right to complain on appeal)
- McNair v. State, 296 Ga. 181 (trial strategy normally not grounds for ineffective assistance unless patently unreasonable)
- Kitchens v. State, 289 Ga. 242 (trial counsel’s tactical decisions fall within wide latitude of reasonable professional conduct)
- Smith v. State, 299 Ga. 424 (harmless-error analysis under Georgia Evidence Code)
- Malcolm v. State, 263 Ga. 369 (effect of vacating felony murder when malice murder conviction is entered)
