Bonnie Sue Roberts in Her Capacity as Independent of the Estate of Charlotte Roberts v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
406 S.W.3d 702
Tex. App.2013Background
- In 1992 Charlotte Roberts obtained a mortgage on a home secured by a deed of trust; Wells Fargo later became the loan servicer and mortgagee.
- Charlotte became disabled; she died in May 2009 and appellant Bonnie Sue Roberts (executrix) inherited the property.
- Roberts defaulted on the mortgage and could not refinance or make payments after Sept. 2009.
- In Sept./Oct. 2010 Roberts submitted an insurance check for hail damage to Wells Fargo after being told proceeds would be disbursed to a roofer; Wells Fargo instead held the funds and applied them to the delinquent mortgage.
- Roberts sued Wells Fargo for conversion, breach of contract, and fraud (among other claims). Wells Fargo moved for partial summary judgment on the claims related to the insurance proceeds.
- The trial court issued a letter on Oct. 13, 2011 announcing partial summary judgment in Wells Fargo’s favor; Roberts filed a nonsuit the next morning. The court later dismissed the summary-judgmented claims with prejudice and affirmed those dismissals on appeal.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether the trial court’s Oct. 13 letter constituted rendition of partial summary judgment, preventing Roberts’ subsequent nonsuit from divesting that ruling | Roberts: the letter wasn’t a judicial pronouncement under Hyundai/Hyundai-related authority and wasn’t filed before her nonsuit, so no rendition occurred | Wells Fargo: the court officially announced its decision by memorandum (the letter), which constitutes rendition when publicly announced and filed; summary-judgmented claims were therefore final before nonsuit | Court: letter constituted rendition (memorandum announced Oct. 13 and filed Oct. 14); nonsuit filed after rendition did not avoid dismissal with prejudice — Issue overruled |
| Whether a genuine issue of material fact existed about Wells Fargo’s timeliness in electing to apply insurance proceeds to the loan rather than to repairs under the deed of trust | Roberts: Wells Fargo equivocated and did not timely make a single election; follow-up letters about repairs show lack of timely election, precluding summary judgment | Wells Fargo: deed of trust granted an option to apply proceeds to indebtedness; it timely elected (within days) to hold/apply proceeds because loan was delinquent and foreclosure procedures applied | Court: no genuine issue of material fact; Wells Fargo’s election within days was timely and contractually authorized application of proceeds to debt — Issue overruled |
Key Cases Cited
- Hyundai Motor Co. v. Alvarado, 892 S.W.2d 853 (Tex. 1995) (nonsuit does not defeat adverse party’s right to have pending claims for affirmative relief heard; effect of nonsuit after unfavorable ruling)
- Garza v. Texas Alcoholic Beverage Commission, 89 S.W.3d 1 (Tex. 2002) (judgment is rendered when announced in open court or by memorandum filed with clerk)
- Via Net v. TIG Insurance Co., 211 S.W.3d 310 (Tex. 2006) (unpleaded claims first raised in summary-judgment response can be tried by consent if movant does not object)
- Epps v. Fowler, 351 S.W.3d 862 (Tex. 2011) (Rule 162 nonsuit principles; effect of nonsuit on pending claims for affirmative relief)
- Statewide Bank v. SN Servicing Corp. v. Keith, 301 S.W.3d 776 (Tex. App. Beaumont 2009) (mortgagee’s multi-month delay can be untimely election under deed of trust)
- English v. Fischer, 660 S.W.2d 521 (Tex. 1983) (deed of trust provision permitting mortgagee to apply insurance proceeds to indebtedness is enforceable)
- Lewis v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc., 248 S.W.3d 828 (Tex. App. Texarkana 2008) (mortgagee’s contractual election to apply proceeds to debt is permissible and not subject to court reallocation)
- Zidell v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Co., 539 S.W.2d 162 (Tex. Civ. App. Dallas 1976) (upholding mortgagee’s right to apply insurance proceeds to debt under contract)
