2022 Ohio 2648
Ohio Ct. App.2022Background
- Appellee (Columbiana County Treasurer Linda Bolon) sued Alan Bowers for delinquent property taxes on a Salineville property and listed two P.O. box addresses in the complaint; mailed notices to those addresses were returned undelivered.
- After the mailed notices failed, the clerk caused notice by publication in the Farm and Dairy; Bowers did not answer and the court entered default judgment, foreclosed the property, and authorized sale and a writ of possession.
- Bowers moved to vacate, claiming he was never properly served and that he had actual, ascertainable addresses (his rural street address on his driver’s license and a P.O. box he used on a money order for a different parcel), so publication-only service was constitutionally inadequate.
- The treasurer submitted affidavits showing certified/ordinary mail to the last known addresses returned, and that searches of county records, phone books, and internet were made before resorting to publication.
- The trial court denied relief, citing R.C. 323.13 (taxpayer’s duty to notify treasurer in writing of mailing-address changes) and finding the treasurer complied with R.C. 5721.18 service procedures; this appeal followed.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument (Bolon) | Defendant's Argument (Bowers) | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether service by publication (after mailed notices returned) satisfied due process / was reasonably diligent | Bolon followed R.C. 5721.18: mailed to last known addresses, searched records and internet, then published; statutory procedure satisfied; no obligation to do more | Publication was constitutionally inadequate because treasurer could have ascertained Bowers’ street address (driver’s license) and P.O. box (money order) with reasonable diligence | Court held service met statutory requirements and was reasonably calculated to give notice; denied vacatur and affirmed |
| Whether a money order (showing a different P.O. box on payment for another parcel) constituted written notice to change tax mailing address under R.C. 323.13 | Treasurer: receiving a payment with a return address does not constitute the statutorily required written change of tax-bill mailing address for a different parcel; office receives thousands of payments | Bowers: listing P.O. Box 0141 on a money order paid to the treasurer gave appellee actual notice of his mailing address | Court held R.C. 323.13 places burden on taxpayer to give written notice of address change; the money order did not satisfy that requirement; Bowers failed to comply and cannot fault treasurer |
Key Cases Cited
- Blakemore v. Blakemore, 5 Ohio St.3d 217 (Ohio 1983) (abuse-of-discretion standard for appellate review of discretionary rulings)
- In re Foreclosure of Liens for Delinquent Taxes, 62 Ohio St.2d 333 (Ohio 1980) (due-process notice must be reasonably calculated to inform property owner; statutory publication procedures satisfy notice when followed)
