Blue v. District of Columbia Public Schools
850 F. Supp. 2d 16
D.D.C.2012Background
- Blue, 18, was a Transition Academy student at Shadd (DCPS) who began a sexual relationship with teacher Robert Weismiller from Nov 2008 to Apr 2009, resulting in a pregnancy and the birth of a daughter in late 2009.
- DCPS conducted an investigation in May 2009; it found no definitive proof of wrongdoing by Weismiller and he was fired in Oct 2009 as part of a system-wide reduction in force.
- Plaintiff alleges Weismiller had prior inappropriate sexual relationships with students in 1976 and 1984, and that Defendants knew or should have known of such conduct.
- Plaintiff filed suit on Sept 7, 2010 against the District of Columbia, DCPS, and former Chancellor Michelle Rhee, plus Weismiller; Second Amended Complaint was filed May 11, 2011.
- District Defendants moved to dismiss; the court grants the motion as to the District Defendants, leaving the case potentially proceeding against Weismiller only.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether DCPS and Rhee can be sued. | Blue argues DCPS is a proper Monell defendant; Rhee can be sued in official capacity. | District argues DCPS is not sui juris and Rhee claims are duplicative of the municipality. | DCPS dismissed; Rhee’s official-capacity claims dismissed as redundant. |
| Whether §1983 claims against the District are viable. | Blue asserts district policy/custom caused violations of bodily integrity and equal protection. | District contends no substantial Monell claim or causation shown. | Plaintiff failed to plead a District policy/custom and causation; §1983 claims dismissed. |
| Whether Title IX §1681 claim can be sustained against the District. | District knew or should have known; deliberate indifference alleged. | There was no actual notice to an appropriate person or deliberate indifference. | Title IX claim fails for lack of actual notice to an appropriate person and deliberate indifference. |
| Whether state-law claims survive given §12-309 notice requirements. | DCPS investigation and reports provided notice; later communications allegedly put District on notice. | No proper written notice to the Mayor within six months; notices to other agencies do not suffice. | State claims dismissed for failure to comply with §12-309 notice. |
Key Cases Cited
- Monell v. Dept. of Soc. Servs. of City of New York, 436 U.S. 658 (U.S. 1978) (municipal liability requires policy or custom, not respondeat superior)
- Pembaur v. City of Cincinnati, 475 U.S. 469 (U.S. 1986) (final policymaker liability; deliberate choice required)
- City of Canton v. Harris, 489 U.S. 378 (U.S. 1989) (moving-force causation for Monell liability)
