Blake v. State
292 Ga. 516
| Ga. | 2013Background
- Blake was indicted in Clayton County in May 2009 for malice murder, two counts of felony murder, aggravated assault, possession of a firearm during a crime, and possession of a firearm by a convicted felon.
- He was tried in October 2010; the jury acquitted malice murder but convicted on other counts and sentenced to two life terms without parole on felony murder counts plus a concurrent firearm term, with remaining counts merged for sentencing.
- The December 2008 shooting at a bar followed an argument over allegedly shorted marijuana and payment; Blake shot Turner after Turner allegedly urged him to retrieve a pistol.
- Eyewitnesses identified Blake as the shooter; Blake claimed self-defense, but no gun was found and Turner’s companions testified Turner was unarmed.
- The appellate court affirmed the convictions but vacated Blake’s sentence, remanding for resentencing due to defects in sentencing law and procedure, including the pre-amendment availability of life without parole and duplicative felony murder sentencing.
- The case was remanded for resentencing consistent with statutory changes and case law.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether the evidence supported Blake’s conviction beyond a reasonable doubt. | Blake contends undisputed facts negate guilt beyond reasonable doubt. | State argues record, viewed favorably to verdict, supports guilt. | Evidence supported conviction beyond reasonable doubt. |
| Whether the trial court erred by not giving an explicit justification defense instruction for all charges. | Blake argues justification should be a defense to all crimes, including felon-in-possession. | State asserts the instruction was correct and adequate. | No plain error; no error in the justification instruction. |
| Whether the trial court should have given a voluntary manslaughter charge. | Blake requested voluntary manslaughter instruction if slight evidence of provocation existed. | State contends evidence did not show irresistible passion. | The court did not err in refusing the charge; no evidence of needed passion. |
| Whether Blake’s sentence was permissible given pre-amendment law and double-counting of felony murder. | Blake argues life without parole was not available for his offenses and multiple convictions were improper. | State concedes misalignment with post-amendment law and recidivist rules. | Vacated and remanded for resentencing; life without parole not applicable and only a single murder sentence should stand. |
Key Cases Cited
- Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 ((1979)) (sufficiency standard requires reasonable-doubt review)
- Allen v. State, 290 Ga. 743 ((2012)) (clarifies sufficiency standard in Georgia)
- Smith v. State, 257 Ga. 468 ((1987)) (instruction on defense theories reviewed for preservation)
- Gillespie v. State, 236 Ga. 845 ((1976)) (requires charge on lesser included offense if slight evidence exists)
- Bell v. State, 280 Ga. 562 ((2006)) (passion standard for voluntary manslaughter)
- Worthem v. State, 270 Ga. 469 ((1999)) (voluntary manslaughter charge not warranted without passion evidence)
- Howard v. State, 258 Ga. 597 ((1988)) (fear of weapon not sufficient to show irresistible passion)
- Webb v. State, 284 Ga. 122 ((2008)) (overreaction and provocation may support manslaughter charge in some cases)
- Brady v. State, 283 Ga. 359 ((2008)) (sentencing error when multiple convictions duplicative under law)
- Williams v. State, 291 Ga. 19 ((2012)) (precedent on life without parole availability pre/post amendment)
