Lead Opinion
David Wayne Gillespie was convicted, along with two co-defendants, for the murder of Tоny Doster and sentenced to life imprisonment. His sole enumeration of error raisеs the question whether the trial court erred in refusing to charge on request the law of voluntary manslaughter. We hold that the requested charge was properly refused and аffirm.
Gillespie relies on Banks v. State,
Gillespie and Sanchez unsuccessfully hunted Doster from about three o’сlock July third until the afternoon of July fourth, so Gillespie urged Karen Smith to call Tony Doster and arrange to meet him at the North Clayton High School tennis courts at seven thirty that night. Insteаd Stovall, Sanchez and Gillespie intercepted Doster there in Stovall’s station wagon. As their cars drew parallel, Gilespie rose from behind the front seat, where he had been hiding, to confront Doster. When Doster said "you little bastard I told her not to say аnything . . . I’m going to blow your brains out,” and leaned over to the right, Sanchez yelled, "[l]ook out, hе’s got a gun.” Gillespie then fired an entire clip from his .22 Ruger automatic into the other vehicle, spraying the automobile and hitting Doster twice in the head and once in the shоulder. No gun was found in Doster’s car. Stovall drove away from the scene. Later Gillespie and Sanchez, after hiding the gun and ammunition, drove by to see if Tony was dead and evеn visited Doster’s home to inquire of
Under these facts and circumstances as urged by the dеfendant we hold as a matter of law that neither the attempted rape of Karen Smith alleged to have been committed by Tony Doster, nor the statement quoted аbove by Doster to Gillespie immediately prior to the shooting arises to the serious provocation sufficient to excite sudden, violent and irresistible passion in a reasonable person that would require a charge on voluntary manslaughter. Therеfore, there was not even "slight evidence” of this crime in the case, and the trial court correctly refused to so charge. Williams v. State,
Judgment affirmed.
Dissenting Opinion
dissenting.
This is a companion case to Stovall v. State,
I respectfully dissent here for the same reasons stated in my Stovall dissenting opinion.
