History
  • No items yet
midpage
93 F.4th 659
4th Cir.
2024
Read the full case

Background

  • Bikachi Amisi, a contract nurse arriving for her first day at Riverside Regional Jail, was mistakenly identified as an inmate and strip searched by Officer Lakeyta Brooks.
  • Amisi clearly communicated she was a nurse reporting for work, but employees, mistaking her for a 'weekender' inmate, subjected her to standard inmate intake procedures.
  • Amisi sued Brooks and other jail employees under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for violating her Fourth Amendment rights and also brought state tort claims under Virginia law.
  • Defendants asserted qualified immunity, Virginia good-faith immunity, and argued that the Virginia Workers’ Compensation Act barred the state-law claims.
  • The district court denied all motions for summary judgment brought by the defendants.
  • On appeal, the Fourth Circuit reviewed questions of qualified immunity, good-faith immunity, and the Act’s exclusivity provision.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Qualified immunity for Brooks (strip search of employee) Brooks unreasonably mistook Amisi for inmate Brooks reasonably thought Amisi was an inmate Denied: Mistake was objectively unreasonable
Qualified immunity for Townsend (seizure/causation) Townsend set the search in motion Townsend did not clearly violate rights; acted reasonably Denied: Actions could be found unreasonable
Virginia Workers’ Comp Act bars state law claims Injury did not arise from employment Exclusivity provision provides immunity from suit Denied: Injury didn't arise out of employment
Virginia good-faith immunity for jail employees Actions were objectively unreasonable Defendants acted in good faith trying to help Amisi Denied: Actions not objectively reasonable

Key Cases Cited

  • Bell v. Wolfish, 441 U.S. 520 (U.S. 1979) (establishing reasonableness requirement for searches of inmates)
  • Leverette v. Bell, 247 F.3d 160 (4th Cir. 2001) (prison employee strip searches require individualized suspicion)
  • Braun v. Maynard, 652 F.3d 557 (4th Cir. 2011) (individualized suspicion required for prison employee searches)
  • Henry v. Purnell, 652 F.3d 524 (4th Cir. 2011) (objectively unreasonable mistakes not entitled to qualified immunity)
  • Mitchell v. Forsyth, 472 U.S. 511 (U.S. 1985) (collateral order doctrine allows immediate appeal of qualified immunity denials)
  • Malley v. Briggs, 475 U.S. 335 (U.S. 1986) (§1983 "effective cause" liability for constitutional deprivation)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Bikachi Amisi v. Lakeyta Brooks
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Feb 22, 2024
Citations: 93 F.4th 659; 21-1960
Docket Number: 21-1960
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
Log In
    Bikachi Amisi v. Lakeyta Brooks, 93 F.4th 659