History
  • No items yet
midpage
526 F. App'x 109
2d Cir.
2013
Read the full case

Background

  • Bergerson was terminated from CNYPC and awarded back pay for Title VII violation; the district court later denied back pay, then remanded for an inquest to justify any denial.
  • On remand, the district court found Bergerson resigned from SLPC due to personal reasons (not unreasonable working conditions) and thus limited back pay to January 31, 2006 to September 26, 2007.
  • The district court held Bergerson failed to mitigate damages after leaving SLPC, because her post-resignation employment was not comparable.
  • The inquest revealed Bergerson returned to Birnie Bus and later worked part-time at the School For The Deaf, neither of which counted as comparable employment.
  • The Second Circuit reviews a district court’s denial of back pay for abuse of discretion and whether Bergerson’s mitigation efforts were reasonable; the court ultimately affirmed the district court’s judgment.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Was the district court’s back-pay denial an abuse of discretion? Bergerson contends mitigation was improperly evaluated. Defendant argues Bergerson failed to mitigate after leaving SLPC. No abuse; court affirms on alternate basis.
Did Bergerson’s departure from SLPC for personal reasons negate mitigation duty? Resignation due to long commute was unreasonable working condition. Employee must mitigate despite personal reasons only if reasonable efforts exist. District court erred in relying on resignation alone to deny mitigation.
Did Bergerson make reasonable efforts to obtain comparable employment after 9/26/2007? Sought other employment; invoked distances and conditions. No reasonable efforts; post-SLPC efforts were not comparable. Defendant carried burden showing no reasonable post-SLPC efforts; back pay denied after 9/26/2007.

Key Cases Cited

  • Hawkins v. 1115 Legal Serv. Care, 163 F.3d 684 (2d Cir. 1998) (duty to mitigate not onerous; reasonable diligence required)
  • Ford Motor Co. v. EEOC, 458 U.S. 219 (U.S. 1982) (personal reasons can negate mitigation in some contexts)
  • Dailey v. Societe Generale, 108 F.3d 451 (2d Cir. 1997) (no need to take demeaning work; not required to switch lines)
  • Greenway v. Buffalo Hilton Hotel, 143 F.3d 47 (2d Cir. 1998) (employer bears burden to show lack of effort to seek comparable work)
  • Broadnax v. City of New Haven, 415 F.3d 265 (2d Cir. 2005) (burden on employer to prove lack of reasonable efforts to obtain suitable work)
  • Albemarle Paper Co. v. Moody, 422 U.S. 405 (U.S. 1975) (mitigation and reasonable efforts context in Title VII remedies)
  • Adirondack Transit Lines, Inc. v. United Transp. Union, Local 1582, 305 F.3d 82 (2d Cir. 2002) (may affirm on any ground supported by record)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Bergerson v. New York State Office of Mental Health
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Date Published: May 9, 2013
Citations: 526 F. App'x 109; 12-1886-cv
Docket Number: 12-1886-cv
Court Abbreviation: 2d Cir.
Log In
    Bergerson v. New York State Office of Mental Health, 526 F. App'x 109