History
  • No items yet
midpage
Bates v. State
2017 Ark. App. 123
| Ark. Ct. App. | 2017
Read the full case

Background

  • Bates appeals his bench-trial conviction for third-degree domestic battering in Poinsett County.
  • Victim Karen Goans testified she lived with Bates for about eleven years prior to January 2016 incident.
  • Goans admitted hospitalization but claimed injuries were not Bates's fault; she said pills caused health issues.
  • Jamie Lewis, Goans's daughter, testified Goans woke from a coma and stated, ‘George did this to me,’ indicating Bates injured her.
  • Trial court admitted part of Jamie’s testimony as an excited utterance; other portions were excluded.
  • Court held jurisdiction was proper and Bates was guilty; he received six months in jail plus six months SIS with no contact and anger management.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Sufficiency of the evidence Bates Bates Supported by substantial evidence
Jurisdiction/venue Bates Bates Jurisdiction affirmed; no affirmative evidence of lack
Admission of Jamie’s excited utterance Bates Bates Court did not abuse discretion; excited utterance admissible

Key Cases Cited

  • Dix v. State, 290 Ark. 28 (1986) (state need not prove jurisdiction unless evidence shows lack)
  • Cates v. State, 329 Ark. 585 (1997) (presumption of jurisdiction when charge filed; proof of venue not required absent negative evidence)
  • Smith v. State, 367 Ark. 274 (2006) (reiterates standard for proving jurisdiction/venue)
  • Findley v. State, 307 Ark. 53 (1991) (jurisdiction/venue analysis in absence of affirmative outside evidence)
  • DeWitt v. State, 306 Ark. 559 (1991) (jurisdiction/venue framework applied)
  • Lewis v. State, 2016 Ark. App. 257 (2016) (treatment of venue/jurisdiction in appeal; admissibility considerations noted)
  • Eichelberger v. State, 323 Ark. 551 (1996) (standard for sufficiency of evidence review)
  • Lowe v. State, 2016 Ark. App. 389 (2016) (trier of fact may resolve conflicting testimony)
  • Pennington v. State, Ark. App. 70 (1988) (excited utterance admissibility is not tied to minutes/hours)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Bates v. State
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Arkansas
Date Published: Mar 1, 2017
Citation: 2017 Ark. App. 123
Docket Number: CR-16-762
Court Abbreviation: Ark. Ct. App.