Bates v. State
2017 Ark. App. 123
| Ark. Ct. App. | 2017Background
- Bates appeals his bench-trial conviction for third-degree domestic battering in Poinsett County.
- Victim Karen Goans testified she lived with Bates for about eleven years prior to January 2016 incident.
- Goans admitted hospitalization but claimed injuries were not Bates's fault; she said pills caused health issues.
- Jamie Lewis, Goans's daughter, testified Goans woke from a coma and stated, ‘George did this to me,’ indicating Bates injured her.
- Trial court admitted part of Jamie’s testimony as an excited utterance; other portions were excluded.
- Court held jurisdiction was proper and Bates was guilty; he received six months in jail plus six months SIS with no contact and anger management.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sufficiency of the evidence | Bates | Bates | Supported by substantial evidence |
| Jurisdiction/venue | Bates | Bates | Jurisdiction affirmed; no affirmative evidence of lack |
| Admission of Jamie’s excited utterance | Bates | Bates | Court did not abuse discretion; excited utterance admissible |
Key Cases Cited
- Dix v. State, 290 Ark. 28 (1986) (state need not prove jurisdiction unless evidence shows lack)
- Cates v. State, 329 Ark. 585 (1997) (presumption of jurisdiction when charge filed; proof of venue not required absent negative evidence)
- Smith v. State, 367 Ark. 274 (2006) (reiterates standard for proving jurisdiction/venue)
- Findley v. State, 307 Ark. 53 (1991) (jurisdiction/venue analysis in absence of affirmative outside evidence)
- DeWitt v. State, 306 Ark. 559 (1991) (jurisdiction/venue framework applied)
- Lewis v. State, 2016 Ark. App. 257 (2016) (treatment of venue/jurisdiction in appeal; admissibility considerations noted)
- Eichelberger v. State, 323 Ark. 551 (1996) (standard for sufficiency of evidence review)
- Lowe v. State, 2016 Ark. App. 389 (2016) (trier of fact may resolve conflicting testimony)
- Pennington v. State, Ark. App. 70 (1988) (excited utterance admissibility is not tied to minutes/hours)
