History
  • No items yet
midpage
Barbara Soules Young and Amy Ganci v. Robert and Hollie Krantz
434 S.W.3d 335
Tex. App.
2014
Read the full case

Background

  • Young hired an architect in 2010 to design an outdoor living space for her home.
  • In June 2011 Young and Perennial entered into the Contract Home Deck Addition for Perennial to perform the work.
  • Young alleges Perennial failed to comply with plans, left materials on properties, used poor quality materials, failed to obtain proper permits, and abandoned the job.
  • McKinney Lumber Company (MLC) filed a mechanic’s lien and later an underlying lawsuit against Perennial and Young; Young’s attorney Ganci represented Young in that suit.
  • On January 30, 2013 Young and Ganci posted an Angie’s List review criticizing Perennial and appellees; appellees filed a petition in intervention asserting defamation and intentional infliction of emotional distress; the TCPA motion to dismiss was filed March 22, 2013 and denied April 22, 2013

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether the TCPA applies to the Angie’s List Review Young contends the Review is protected free speech under the TCPA Krantz/Perennial contend the Review is defamatory and not protected TCPA applied; review within right to free speech and public concern
Whether appellees proved a prima facie case for defamation and IIED after TCPA dismissal Appellees must show each element with clear and specific evidence Once TCPA applies, appellees must prove defamation/IIED elements with clear, specific evidence Appellees failed to provide clear and specific evidence for essential elements; IIED also failed; dismissal affirmed on remand

Key Cases Cited

  • Better Business Bureau of Metropolitan Dallas v. BH DFW, Inc., 402 S.W.3d 299 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2013) (courts considering TCPA burden shift apply a prima facie standard with heightened evidence)
  • Molinet v. Kimbrell, 356 S.W.3d 407 (Tex. 2011) (statutory construction; purpose of TCPA)
  • Avila v. Larrea, 394 S.W.3d 646 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2012) (defamation per se analysis under TCPA context)
  • Newspaper Holdings, Inc. v. Crazy Hotel Assisted Living Ltd., 416 S.W.3d 71 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2013) (defamation standard under TCPA burden shift)
  • Hancock v. Variyam, 400 S.W.3d 59 (Tex. 2013) (defamation fault standard for private figure)
  • Gumpert v. ABP Freight Sys., Inc., 293 S.W.3d 256 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2009) (defamatory meaning and factual vs opinion assessment)
  • Yiamouyjannis v. Thompson, 764 S.W.2d 338 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1988) (distinguishing fact from opinion)
  • Moser v. Roberts, 185 S.W.3d 912 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi 2006) (IIED applicability when other tort basis exists)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Barbara Soules Young and Amy Ganci v. Robert and Hollie Krantz
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Texas
Date Published: May 28, 2014
Citation: 434 S.W.3d 335
Docket Number: 05-13-00853-CV
Court Abbreviation: Tex. App.