Barbara Soules Young and Amy Ganci v. Robert and Hollie Krantz
434 S.W.3d 335
Tex. App.2014Background
- Young hired an architect in 2010 to design an outdoor living space for her home.
- In June 2011 Young and Perennial entered into the Contract Home Deck Addition for Perennial to perform the work.
- Young alleges Perennial failed to comply with plans, left materials on properties, used poor quality materials, failed to obtain proper permits, and abandoned the job.
- McKinney Lumber Company (MLC) filed a mechanic’s lien and later an underlying lawsuit against Perennial and Young; Young’s attorney Ganci represented Young in that suit.
- On January 30, 2013 Young and Ganci posted an Angie’s List review criticizing Perennial and appellees; appellees filed a petition in intervention asserting defamation and intentional infliction of emotional distress; the TCPA motion to dismiss was filed March 22, 2013 and denied April 22, 2013
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether the TCPA applies to the Angie’s List Review | Young contends the Review is protected free speech under the TCPA | Krantz/Perennial contend the Review is defamatory and not protected | TCPA applied; review within right to free speech and public concern |
| Whether appellees proved a prima facie case for defamation and IIED after TCPA dismissal | Appellees must show each element with clear and specific evidence | Once TCPA applies, appellees must prove defamation/IIED elements with clear, specific evidence | Appellees failed to provide clear and specific evidence for essential elements; IIED also failed; dismissal affirmed on remand |
Key Cases Cited
- Better Business Bureau of Metropolitan Dallas v. BH DFW, Inc., 402 S.W.3d 299 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2013) (courts considering TCPA burden shift apply a prima facie standard with heightened evidence)
- Molinet v. Kimbrell, 356 S.W.3d 407 (Tex. 2011) (statutory construction; purpose of TCPA)
- Avila v. Larrea, 394 S.W.3d 646 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2012) (defamation per se analysis under TCPA context)
- Newspaper Holdings, Inc. v. Crazy Hotel Assisted Living Ltd., 416 S.W.3d 71 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2013) (defamation standard under TCPA burden shift)
- Hancock v. Variyam, 400 S.W.3d 59 (Tex. 2013) (defamation fault standard for private figure)
- Gumpert v. ABP Freight Sys., Inc., 293 S.W.3d 256 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2009) (defamatory meaning and factual vs opinion assessment)
- Yiamouyjannis v. Thompson, 764 S.W.2d 338 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1988) (distinguishing fact from opinion)
- Moser v. Roberts, 185 S.W.3d 912 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi 2006) (IIED applicability when other tort basis exists)
