Bair v. Manor Care of Elizabethtown, PA
108 A.3d 94
| Pa. Super. Ct. | 2015Background
- Decedent was admitted to Manor Care in April 2011; her daughter and power-of-attorney holder, M. Sylvia Bair, signed admissions paperwork including a printed "Voluntary Arbitration Agreement" on behalf of the patient.
- The 2011 arbitration form had blanks for parties and date, referenced an attached brochure that was not included, and the Center Representative signature line was left blank.
- Manor Care sought to compel arbitration; the trial court permitted discovery on enforceability and overruled Manor Care’s preliminary objections, finding no agreement to arbitrate.
- Bair testified nobody explained the arbitration agreement to her at admission; she signed believing it was required for admission.
- Manor Care produced a fully executed arbitration agreement from 2009 bearing signatures from both sides; the trial court relied on that prior course of dealing to infer Manor Care normally completed and signed the form.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether there was a binding arbitration agreement in 2011 | The unsigned, undated form lacking party names and the brochure is facially deficient and shows no mutual assent by Manor Care | Presentation of the form constituted an offer; Bair’s signature accepted it; Manor Care need not sign to be bound | No enforceable agreement: blanks and missing Center signature/brochure show lack of mutual assent |
Key Cases Cited
- Gaffer Ins. Co. v. Discover Reinsurance Co., 936 A.2d 1109 (Pa. Super. 2007) (standard for reviewing denial of petition to compel arbitration)
- Bucks Orthopaedic Surgery Associates, P.C. v. Ruth, 925 A.2d 868 (Pa. Super. 2007) (contract interpretation reviewed de novo)
- E.E.O.C. v. Waffle House, Inc., 534 U.S. 279 (2002) (arbitration requires an express agreement)
- Lackner v. Glosser, 892 A.2d 21 (Pa. Super. 2006) (offers must be sufficiently definite; essential terms required)
- Hopkins v. New Day Fin., 643 F. Supp. 2d 704 (E.D. Pa. 2009) (discusses whether unsigned writing may be enforced)
