History
  • No items yet
midpage
Avetisyan v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services
2:22-cv-00407
| W.D. Wash. | Feb 15, 2023
Read the full case

Background

  • Plaintiff Armen Avetisyan filed suit in March 2022 seeking review of USCIS’s handling of his naturalization (alleging delay and seeking relief under the APA).
  • Avetisyan obtained conditional permanent resident status in 2007; conditions were removed in 2010.
  • He filed two naturalization applications: Sept. 30, 2011 (denied Oct. 29, 2012) and Sept. 14, 2012 (denied Apr. 25, 2013).
  • The Government moved for summary judgment in May 2022, arguing Avetisyan’s claims are time-barred by 28 U.S.C. § 2401(a)’s six-year statute of limitations.
  • The district court found USCIS’s denials were final agency actions that started the six-year limitations period, so Avetisyan’s March 2022 complaint was untimely as to those actions.
  • The court granted the Government’s motion for summary judgment and noted Avetisyan remains free to file a new naturalization application with USCIS.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether Avetisyan’s APA challenge to USCIS action is time-barred under 28 U.S.C. § 2401(a) Avetisyan challenged USCIS delay/denials and filed suit in 2022 The six-year statute bars actions filed more than six years after the right of action accrues; accrual is final agency action Court: Claims are time-barred; summary judgment for defendant
When the limitations period accrued for review of naturalization matters (Implicit) Accrual occurred at some point later or after continuing delay Accrual occurs at the time of final agency action (the denials on Oct. 29, 2012 and Apr. 25, 2013) Court: Accrual at denial dates; deadlines were 2018 and 2019, so 2022 filing is untimely

Key Cases Cited

  • Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317 (1986) (moving party’s burden on summary judgment)
  • Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242 (1986) (standard for genuine issue of material fact on summary judgment)
  • Wind River Mining Corp. v. United States, 946 F.2d 710 (9th Cir. 1991) (APA/judicial review accrual tied to final agency action)
  • Soremekun v. Thrifty Payless, Inc., 509 F.3d 978 (9th Cir. 2007) (burden where moving party will have trial burden)
  • Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Prods., 530 U.S. 133 (2000) (view evidence and inferences favorably to nonmoving party)
  • Keenan v. Allan, 91 F.3d 1275 (9th Cir. 1996) (court not required to scour record for triable issues)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Avetisyan v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services
Court Name: District Court, W.D. Washington
Date Published: Feb 15, 2023
Docket Number: 2:22-cv-00407
Court Abbreviation: W.D. Wash.