History
  • No items yet
midpage
629 F.3d 505
5th Cir.
2011
Read the full case

Background

  • AT&T received USF payments from federal and state programs in 1998 and 1999 totaling $1.554 billion; AT&T treated these as revenue and did not earmark them, but they were not included in 1998–1999 gross income for tax purposes while USF assessments were deductible expenses.
  • AT&T paid the USFs' assessments and regulations required carriers to participate; the USFs were designed to offset costs or lost revenues from servicing high-cost and low-income customers.
  • The IRS assessed deficiencies for not reporting USF payments as income; AT&T refunded those deficiencies and sought refunds of $505 million.
  • AT&T claimed USF payments were nonshareholder capital contributions excludable under 26 U.S.C. § 118(a), arguing the funds increased AT&T’s capital.
  • The district court granted summary judgment for the Government, concluding USF payments were income, not capital contributions, and this was adopted on appeal.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Are USF payments capital contributions or income? AT&T: payments intended as capital contributions. U.S.: payments compensate for lost revenue, not capital. Payments were income, not capital contributions.
May government intent be determined from statutes/regulations or CB&Q factors? AT&T: intent can be inferred from CB&Q factors. Government intent shown by statutory/regulatory framework. Either method shows income characterization.
Do CB&Q factors require bargaining, permanency, etc., to be capital contributions? AT&T: payments were bargained-for and capital. Payments are unilateral regulatory constructs. CB&Q factors not satisfied; not capital contributions.

Key Cases Cited

  • United States v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Co., 412 U.S. 401 (U.S. 1973) (establishes five CB&Q factors for capital contributions)
  • Detroit Edison Co. v. Commissioner, 319 U.S. 98 (U.S. 1943) (income vs. capital based on service payments to customers)
  • Brown Shoe Co. v. Commissioner, 339 U.S. 583 (U.S. 1950) (inducements can be capital contributions when unrelated to service payments)
  • Coastal Utilities, Inc., 514 F.3d 1184 (11th Cir. 2008) (CB&Q factors applied; payments not capital contributions)
  • Texas & Pacific Railway v. United States, 286 U.S. 285 (U.S. 1932) (payments to guarantee minimum operating income were income)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: At&t, Inc. v. United States
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Date Published: Jan 4, 2011
Citations: 629 F.3d 505; 2011 WL 9729; 09-50651
Docket Number: 09-50651
Court Abbreviation: 5th Cir.
Log In
    At&t, Inc. v. United States, 629 F.3d 505