History
  • No items yet
midpage
319 Ga. App. 250
Ga. Ct. App.
2012
Read the full case

Background

  • Savko sued Hart County deputy Ankerich and Sheriff Cleveland in official capacities, seeking damages for injuries from a traffic collision where Ankerich was directing traffic.
  • Savko served State Farm and Nationwide as uninsured/underinsured motorist carriers on the complaint.
  • Savko sought summary judgment on whether sovereign immunity was waived by Hart County’s purchase of liability insurance under OCGA § 33-24-51.
  • The patrol car was parked about 18 feet from the intersection; blue lights were active, and Ankerich directed traffic from the intersection with reflective gear.
  • The trial court denied summary judgment on immunity, finding issues of ‘use’ for a jury to decide, and also denied Savko’s UM/coverage-related motions.
  • The appellate court held the patrol car was not in ‘use’ for sovereign immunity waiver, reversed the immunity denial, and affirmed denial of Savko’s UM coverage motions.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Was sovereign immunity waived by insurance due to use of the patrol car? Savko argues use occurred via patrol car as vehicle. Ankerich contends no use, car not actively serving as a vehicle. No waiver; patrol car not in use for immunity purposes.
Are Savko’s UM claims triggered by the use of Ankerich’s patrol car? Savko contends UM coverage should apply because use of the patrol car caused injury. Ankerich/Nationwide/State Farm argue no use, no UM trigger. UM coverage not triggered; use not established.

Key Cases Cited

  • Gish v. Thomas, 302 Ga. App. 854 (2010) (use of vehicle must originate from vehicle use; not mere presence or ancillary use)
  • Williams v. Whitfield County, 289 Ga. App. 301 (2008) (static equipment on roadside does not constitute use)
  • Saylor v. Troup County, 225 Ga. App. 489 (1997) (inactive vehicle not in use negates immunity waiver)
  • Tittle v. Corso, 256 Ga. App. 859 (2002) (patrol car not in use, insurance purchase does not waive immunity)
  • Rampell v. Williams, 217 Ga. App. 292 (1995) (causation required; use must be actual source of injury)
  • Simmons v. Coweta County, 229 Ga. App. 550 (1997) (insurance procurement does not by itself waive immunity)
  • Abercrombie v. Ga. Farm Bureau Mutual Ins. Co., 216 Ga. App. 602 (1995) (causation requirement for UM coverage linkage to use)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Ankerich v. Savko
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Date Published: Nov 28, 2012
Citations: 319 Ga. App. 250; 734 S.E.2d 805; 2012 Fulton County D. Rep. 3839; 2012 Ga. App. LEXIS 1010; A12A0974, A12A0975
Docket Number: A12A0974, A12A0975
Court Abbreviation: Ga. Ct. App.
Log In
    Ankerich v. Savko, 319 Ga. App. 250