History
  • No items yet
midpage
Andrews v. State
293 Ga. 701
Ga.
2013
Read the full case

Background

  • Andrews, Calhoun, and Davis chased Cornelius Lowe to steal drugs; Lowe was shot multiple times and died. A .22 gun and matching Winchester .22 bullets were recovered; footprint and ammunition evidence linked defendants to the scene; a box of similar bullets was found at Andrews’s home.
  • Co-defendants and Andrews made post-arrest admissions to others and to cellmates implicating themselves in the robbery/shooting; threats were made to potential witnesses.
  • Andrews was indicted for malice murder and felony murder, tried by jury, convicted of both, and sentenced to life for malice murder; felony-murder conviction vacated by operation of law.
  • Andrews appealed, raising ineffective assistance (failure to call alibi witness Africa Hill), admission of co-defendant hearsay, and denial of a mistrial over alleged prosecutorial statements about future dangerousness.
  • Trial counsel testified he did not call Hill due to inconsistent statements and phone-record issues; Andrews did not lodge contemporaneous objections at trial to the challenged hearsay or closing-argument remarks.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Sufficiency of evidence for murder convictions Andrews argued he was at girlfriend’s house and not a participant State argued forensic, testimonial, and admissions evidence linked Andrews to the killing Evidence sufficient; convictions affirmed (Jackson standard)
Ineffective assistance for not calling alibi witness Andrews: counsel should have called Africa Hill to corroborate alibi Counsel: Hill gave inconsistent statements and phone records undermined credibility; strategic choice not to call her No ineffective assistance; strategic decision reasonable under Strickland
Admission of co-defendant hearsay at trial Andrews: hearsay statements of co-defendants were improperly admitted State: no contemporaneous objection was made at trial; issues waived Issue waived on appeal for lack of contemporaneous objection
Denial of mistrial for alleged future-dangerousness comments Andrews: prosecutor’s closing implied Andrews’ future dangerousness; trial court erred denying mistrial State: Andrews failed to contemporaneously object or move for mistrial; co-defendant’s untimely motion does not preserve error Waived for failure to object; no reviewable error on appeal

Key Cases Cited

  • Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 (standard for sufficiency of the evidence)
  • Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (ineffective assistance two-prong test)
  • Green v. State, 291 Ga. 287 (counsel’s reasonable strategy defeats ineffective-assistance claim)
  • Odom v. State, 279 Ga. 599 (evidence permitting finding of party liability)
  • Bailey v. State, 291 Ga. 144 (contemporaneous objection requirement to preserve hearsay error)
  • Henderson v. State, 285 Ga. 240 (failure to object waives appellate review of closing argument)
  • Tennyson v. State, 282 Ga. 92 (untimely mistrial motions are not preserved on appeal)
  • Malcolm v. State, 263 Ga. 369 (vacatur of felony-murder conviction by operation of law)
  • Robinson v. State, 277 Ga. 75 (appellate review accepts trial-court fact findings and independently applies law)
  • Fuller v. State, 277 Ga. 505 (Strickland burden discussion)
  • Sterling v. State, 267 Ga. 209 (improper future-dangerousness arguments)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Andrews v. State
Court Name: Supreme Court of Georgia
Date Published: Oct 7, 2013
Citation: 293 Ga. 701
Docket Number: S13A0679
Court Abbreviation: Ga.