Andrews v. State
293 Ga. 701
Ga.2013Background
- Andrews, Calhoun, and Davis chased Cornelius Lowe to steal drugs; Lowe was shot multiple times and died. A .22 gun and matching Winchester .22 bullets were recovered; footprint and ammunition evidence linked defendants to the scene; a box of similar bullets was found at Andrews’s home.
- Co-defendants and Andrews made post-arrest admissions to others and to cellmates implicating themselves in the robbery/shooting; threats were made to potential witnesses.
- Andrews was indicted for malice murder and felony murder, tried by jury, convicted of both, and sentenced to life for malice murder; felony-murder conviction vacated by operation of law.
- Andrews appealed, raising ineffective assistance (failure to call alibi witness Africa Hill), admission of co-defendant hearsay, and denial of a mistrial over alleged prosecutorial statements about future dangerousness.
- Trial counsel testified he did not call Hill due to inconsistent statements and phone-record issues; Andrews did not lodge contemporaneous objections at trial to the challenged hearsay or closing-argument remarks.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sufficiency of evidence for murder convictions | Andrews argued he was at girlfriend’s house and not a participant | State argued forensic, testimonial, and admissions evidence linked Andrews to the killing | Evidence sufficient; convictions affirmed (Jackson standard) |
| Ineffective assistance for not calling alibi witness | Andrews: counsel should have called Africa Hill to corroborate alibi | Counsel: Hill gave inconsistent statements and phone records undermined credibility; strategic choice not to call her | No ineffective assistance; strategic decision reasonable under Strickland |
| Admission of co-defendant hearsay at trial | Andrews: hearsay statements of co-defendants were improperly admitted | State: no contemporaneous objection was made at trial; issues waived | Issue waived on appeal for lack of contemporaneous objection |
| Denial of mistrial for alleged future-dangerousness comments | Andrews: prosecutor’s closing implied Andrews’ future dangerousness; trial court erred denying mistrial | State: Andrews failed to contemporaneously object or move for mistrial; co-defendant’s untimely motion does not preserve error | Waived for failure to object; no reviewable error on appeal |
Key Cases Cited
- Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 (standard for sufficiency of the evidence)
- Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (ineffective assistance two-prong test)
- Green v. State, 291 Ga. 287 (counsel’s reasonable strategy defeats ineffective-assistance claim)
- Odom v. State, 279 Ga. 599 (evidence permitting finding of party liability)
- Bailey v. State, 291 Ga. 144 (contemporaneous objection requirement to preserve hearsay error)
- Henderson v. State, 285 Ga. 240 (failure to object waives appellate review of closing argument)
- Tennyson v. State, 282 Ga. 92 (untimely mistrial motions are not preserved on appeal)
- Malcolm v. State, 263 Ga. 369 (vacatur of felony-murder conviction by operation of law)
- Robinson v. State, 277 Ga. 75 (appellate review accepts trial-court fact findings and independently applies law)
- Fuller v. State, 277 Ga. 505 (Strickland burden discussion)
- Sterling v. State, 267 Ga. 209 (improper future-dangerousness arguments)
